<p>Though I know the OFFICIAL difference between “practice” and “practise”, the former being a noun and the latter a verb - some people believe that “practise” should only be used for describing routines, beliefs, and professions. Many believe it is incorrect to use the “practise” form as a synonym for training.</p>
<p>So, on the SAT, which of the two would be considered correct?</p>
<li><p>I practised for the SAT everyday.</p></li>
<li><p>I practiced for the SAT everyday.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>Actually, though organise is incorrect in American English - they are both correct in British English. ;)</p>
<p>Well, sometimes they do test stuff like this. If you notice, sometimes in Writing, you can spot errors like effecting instead of affecting and illusion instead of allusion. So yeah, it’s definitely possible.</p>
<p>But I’m more concerned with it for the essay. ;)</p>
<p>The difference between “illusion” and “allusion” is pretty big. The difference between “practise” and “practice” isn’t. They’d never test that because most people think it’s just a matter of British English vs. American English, and they can’t argue that one is more correct than the other.</p>
<p>Uttaresh, I could be wrong, but I am in the US and educated here with 2 graduate degrees. I never have seen practise used in our version of writing. In my humble opinion practise is only for England.</p>
<p>Perhaps you’re right. I tried Merriam-Webster, and I found “practise” as the secondary version of “practice”. So maybe we should use practice for verbs, too, on the SAT?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>And what of the difference between affect and effect? That’s the same as practise and practice - and I’ve seen it on a test before.</p>
<p>It’s strange seeing that everyone thinks I’m wrong about affect and effect and practice and practise.</p>
<p>I guess it’s all different in American. In British, the difference in affect and effect is the same as the difference between practise and practice - that is to say, one is a noun and the other a verb.</p>
<p>So I should stick with practice, then?</p>
<p>And whatever you may say, affect and effect are very similar - the only difference being that one is a noun and the other a verb. I may use the same reasoning as yours to state that practice and practise are not the same, as:</p>
<p>Practice is something that is usually or regularly done, often as a habit, tradition or custom - or when you do something regularly or repeatedly to improve a skill.</p>
<p>Practise is to do something regularly, often according to a custom, religion or set of rules, or as a habit OR to do or play something regularly or repeatedly in order to become skilled at it.</p>
<p>Actually, effect can be used as either a verb or a noun. But the key here is that the practice/practise difference is in British English only, and thus not applicable.</p>
<p>Affect and effect are different in that an “affect” is limited in usage as a noun to things like “His mental affect was that of a drunk…” You would never say that “The affect of the peace negotiations was…” There you would use effect.</p>
<p>Really, I have read many books, and taught writing, and I would mark any use of practise as incorrect spelling.</p>
<p>I’m British, and I would use ‘practise’ if I said “I practise my violin for sixteen hours every day”. Though it would be ‘practice’ if I was talking about where a doctor works.</p>
<p>SAT graders have a competent knowledge of the English language. No one will tell you that “colour” is incorrect. “Colour” is British. You can’t be penalized for spelling something differently, if both ways are correct.</p>