<p>Can someone predict my score.</p>
<p>M - 1 omit, 2 wrong
CR - 2 omit, 6 wrong
W - 5 wrong</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Can someone predict my score.</p>
<p>M - 1 omit, 2 wrong
CR - 2 omit, 6 wrong
W - 5 wrong</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>This should be pretty accurate:</p>
<p>M: 730
CR: 700
W: 67 MC</p>
<p>Most people are terrible at predicting curves. Just use this link - <a href=“http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-Released-Test-Curves.pdf[/url]”>http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-Released-Test-Curves.pdf</a>
It has the curves of a lot of released tests.</p>
<p>Maybe these people who predict curves actually use that website. </p>
<p>Don’t make generalizations.</p>
<p>A generalization would be ‘Everyone is terrible at predicting curves’. ‘Most people are terrible at predicting curves.’ is merely stating a fact.
If most people use that website, why not just post the link and save everyone a lot of trouble?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>So then what would, “some people are terrible at predicting curves” be? how about “He is terrible at predicting curves” ?</p>
<p>I saved him a lot of trouble by figuring out his scores for him without him having to go on the website.</p>
<p>How’s this for saving people trouble? <a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/882644-consolidated-march-2010-sat-full-score-conversion-chart.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/882644-consolidated-march-2010-sat-full-score-conversion-chart.html</a></p>