I don’t think it’s correct to say that the school has accepted all accusations by the victims. For instance, the school’s report identifies the number of victims as being lower than the number that the victims themselves have made public, the report only identifies one of the perpetrators by name, and does not concede that that current administration knew about the abuses and was covering it up. Now, I’m not saying that the current administration DID know and cover it up, but at least one of the victims says that he told the current headmaster some time ago and he did nothing. I have no basis at all to judge who’s telling the truth about that, and I don’t purport to do so. I’m just saying that IF the victim is right about that, I’d certainly understand why he would feel that the school has not in fact accepted full responsibility for its actions. I don’t know how fully the existing investigator looked into any allegations about the current administration being complicit after the fact, perhaps he was more focused on the historical events. If that’s the case, it seems to me that a more independent investigator could well lead to a different outcome.