<p>**Does anyone know which section was the experimental section in Practice Test 4<a href=“The%20last%20one”>/B</a>, of the Cracking The SAT PRINCETON REVIEW book. Not surprisingly, the idiots at PR made many mistakes in their books including the problems in the test. Here they left out the answer key for the final practice test…</p>
<p>Also i scored at max around 2020-2060 in 2 of the 4 practice tests in the PR book(My low range is about 1860-1950)… Does anyone know how well this score predicts my actual SAT score next Saturday…?<a href=“I%20basically%20started%20practicing%20on%20Monday…”>I</a>* Because I heard that the princeton review tests are usually harder than the actual SAT and also the CB book.</p>
<p>Please reply soon, Thanks, definitely reply if you have the book with you, thanks.</p>
<p>They are a bit harder, but at your level, the discrepancy in difficulty won’t matter much.</p>
<p>I’ve took 2 SATs by only using the PR book. While I was getting 1800 in the practice tests, I got a 2130 in the actual test. Note that this variation can float a lot depending on the texts, words used on sentence completion, etc.</p>
<p>So is it possible for me to score above 2100 this saturday?</p>
<p>This is late, but I was wondering the same thing, and I figured out that section 5 (math) is the experimental section.</p>
<p>There can only be one math section that has grid-ins, and section 2 also had grid-ins. On the SAT, section 2 and section 3 MUST be either math/reading OR reading/math. Thus, since section 2 already had the grid-ins, section 5 isn’t counted.</p>
<p>Anyway, hope you did well.</p>