<p>Adam Robinson should be embarrassed. </p>
<p>“but it’s also…?” Wow. </p>
<p>[url=<a href=“http://min.us/mbmB06NiPv]F.A.I.L.[/url”>http://min.us/mbmB06NiPv]F.A.I.L.[/url</a>]</p>
<p>Adam Robinson should be embarrassed. </p>
<p>“but it’s also…?” Wow. </p>
<p>[url=<a href=“http://min.us/mbmB06NiPv]F.A.I.L.[/url”>http://min.us/mbmB06NiPv]F.A.I.L.[/url</a>]</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure “it’s” could also be a contraction for “it has,” and then it would make sense in context.</p>
<p>MW, it should be “but also revolutionized,” which is parallel to “not only significantly boosted.”</p>
<p>Pointing out this mistake makes you so cool!</p>