<p>Oh ske293, we see your point. Yes, Harvard has done very well in the competition and you should be proud of that. More recently, however, the top five finishes look like this:</p>
<p>Top Five Finishes in the Last 10 Years</p>
<p>9 — Harvard
8 — MIT, Duke
6 — Princeton</p>
<p>Top Five Finishes in the Last 5 Years</p>
<p>4 — Princeton
4 — Harvard
4 — MIT
4 — Duke</p>
<p>Now don’t be worried that anyone is suggesting that Harvard doesn’t have a great math department and plenty of top notch math students. Also, I understand that Harvard has taken this competition quite seriously for many years. As noted in the Wikipedia article:</p>
<p>"While some may see this as a rough gauge of the level of the undergraduate Mathematical programs at various institutions, a number of factors militate against this assumption:</p>
<p>– Some institutions have participated for many years while others are relative latecomers. </p>
<p>– Some university teams actively train for the competition with faculty help and reference to past years’ questions; at others, there is a student club which practices ? but at many institutions, there is no formal preparation at all. </p>
<p>– As described earlier in this article, it is possible for the official members of a team to not score as highly as others from the same university who have not been designated members of the official team. </p>
<p>– Finally, and most importantly, “contest math” is seen by many as quite different from original mathematical research “the primary aim of most university math departments” and is not necessarily the best predictor of it.
<a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putnam_competition[/url]”>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putnam_competition</a></p>
<p>So, congratulations to Princeton this year and to Harvard for its many years of fine performances!</p>