<p>@SignatureCC: I think I picked something about some scientist wanting to preserve the dwindling habitats of a kind of monkey. It was a last minute guess. :P</p>
<p>I also put E. What about in the writing section the one about Mozarts book? was it “,selecting and applying”?</p>
<p>noooo idea what the two-hat thing meant. It blew right over my head haha. </p>
<p>@hsjunior - I may have put something along the lines of “as compared to”, but I may have chosen another close option that talked about comparison.</p>
<p>@mbswimmer - I also put “, selecting and applying”</p>
<p>I think I put B for that one. Shouldn’t it be “WILL stand a chance of qualifying” or is that wrong?</p>
<p>Mozart was selecting and applying, all others were redundant or comma splice. The 2006 one had to be “as had applied in” because as… as is a word pair. When you use as once, you need it again.
Ex. He was as lazy as a sloth. You cannot say He was as lazy like a loth.
As compared to is redundant because it is already clear the two are being compared since 2006 is described as having “more” whatever it was.</p>
<p>HS junior i think you are right, but “would” wasn’t underlined I don’t think, just “of qualifying”</p>
<p>@hsjunio12
I put that too… I’m not sure!</p>
<p>@hsjunior - I narrowed it down to “as compared to” and “as had applied in” and I chose compared</p>
<p>the last question of the writing section was leave it as it is right?</p>
<p>Someone told me one of the answers was ‘indirectly’ for the writing section or something because it had to be an adverb? I don’t remember the question can anyone let me know?</p>
<p>@kboyisaac I got the same thing I’m certain that’s correct</p>
<p>@SignatureCC “stand” was underlined also… I think the first part of the sentence was: The coach told (friend’s name) and me that we stand a chance of qualifying for the swim team next year if…</p>
<p>i think it was incredibly for the sentence id</p>
<p>Yea but do u remember the question?</p>
<p>for the india passage what was the thought in the second?</p>
<p>isolation?</p>
<p>guys did u say jubilant or amicable for the passage about indians</p>
<p>The last writing question was comparing shakespeare to literature or something other than a person, so A was the right answer…</p>
<p>Does anybody know if problem #30 with “not yet formerly” was incorrect?</p>
<p>Overall I had 2/3 “No errors” depending on #30</p>
<p>@morpheus44</p>
<p>I forget, but i think it had to do with spiders something about them being incredible large</p>
<p>[stand</a> a chance - Idioms - by the Free Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.](<a href=“Stand a chance]stand - Idioms by The Free Dictionary”>Stand a chance - Idioms by The Free Dictionary)</p>
<p>based on this definition… is the sentence supposed to be “will stand a chance” or was there no error.</p>
<p>hsjunior so what did you put for that question, e?</p>
<p>the word would was not even in that sentence kirby1996.</p>
<h1>30 formerly was incorrect, the usage was wrong.</h1>
<p>And I agree that Shakespeare was A</p>