<p>siemprell - what was the answer choice regarindg the scientist and monkey? I don’t recall that choice</p>
<p>How many did you skip? I skipped 3 in CR and 2 in math because I couldn’t finish it in time :/</p>
<p>good 'ol 2 hat Q. I believe it was the guy that was “advocating” policy or something like that. I think thats the monkey guy but I forget. I’m from MA btw where the NMSQT qualifier is like 225 so that’s great.</p>
<p>@andrew - was that monkey guy the one about preserving ecosystems or something? I put the one taht was advocating policy as well, hope i picked the right one</p>
<p>@Andrew that’s tough man</p>
<p>@qwertyuiop0
That was E. I believe.</p>
<p>I skipped nothing… I hope that doesn’t come back to bite me.</p>
<p>@siemprell : thanks! I know I put e for taht one =]
Didn’t even notice the monkey part in there, just remmebre advocating some policy,lol</p>
<p>@qwertyuiop0
that was the guy advocating the policy.
@andrew
Yea I’m from MA as well… But I mean I came to US like 3 years ago, so I’m not even thinking about Merit.</p>
<p>So if we got a fill in the grid question wrong they don’t give us points or take them away?</p>
<p>@qwertyuiop0
It’s more like chimpanzee than monkey 0.0</p>
<p>So do you guys remmeber if the scientist would publish papers?
other choies were like
- receive grants
- receive accolades</p>
<p>yeah, I think by “two hats” the passage meant that the person was acting both as a scientist and a citizen. so the answer would be E, the biologist campaigning for the preservation of chimp habitats.</p>
<p>@longhorn
There’s no penalty for wrong grid-ins.</p>
<p>@LonghornNation
Correct</p>
<p>For the number 19 grammar, it said Mozart’s book something something predecessors’ interpretations,_______________________.</p>
<p>I thought it was the suspecting and other ing one, but that would be a misplaced modifier since it comes after and that would mean that the interpretations are suspecting, which is incorrect. I chose which they suspect and analyze material… since that would be grammatically correct since they, whomever it was the subject of the sentence, used the interpretations.</p>
<p>@qwertyuiop0
I said receive grants for that one, but then again I wasn’t quite sure what accolades meant haha.</p>
<p>Okay thank you @quirky and @siemprell</p>
<p>@qwertyuiop0
Don’t remember anything like that >.> Oh my terrible memory</p>
<p>Do you guys remember any passages from the 1st section? The India one and the science one were both from the 2nd seciont, rihgt?</p>