<p>somekid - yes, fairly sure
Whatd you guys put for the reason of listing the 4th 5th 6th grader one for the TV/reading?
I said it was an example of something (forget what it was lol)</p>
<p>I forget what the question was but I put just I and II.</p>
<p>@qwertyuiop0
It was like to demonstrate the level of interpretations? Something along that line.</p>
<p>@qwertyuiop0
I put the one about how they have different experience levels.
btw your username is so much fun to type out haha</p>
<p>@siemprell: do you rememerb if that choice had the word “example” in it? that’s all i remember for what i put for that question xD</p>
<p>@qwertyuiop0
hmm…
i don’t really know…
@quirky, any ideas?</p>
<p>lol quirky xD
Btw, was one of the answersa bout how kids aren’t skeptical when htey read or soemthing along those lines?</p>
<p>I honestly have no idea, I didn’t spend a lot of time on that one.</p>
<p>@qwertyuiop0
Yea one of the answers was regarding skepticism</p>
<p>Well based on what’s being said here, I think I got around 190. Decent for a freshman?</p>
<p>@quirkymath
Sure is.
Good job man!</p>
<p>@quirky - not bad at all. By junior year you probably should be able to get at least 30 points higher, so hopefuly yo ucan qualify for national merit</p>
<p>For the number 20 on grammar with the comparison, you had to compare the number of patenters to another year. I picked compared to those… I saw someone said it was an as…as comparison. I don’t remember</p>
<p>@Protoman600
It’s “as had applied”</p>
<p>what’s the consensus on that mozart question? i picked the option that was like ,(gerund) and (gerund)</p>
<p>What was the answer to the writing question in the passage about shopping that wanted you to find what needed to be changed the most in one of the sentences? Two of the answer choices were “analyzed” to “analyzes” or “people’s” to “a shopper’s”</p>
<p>@infrapr0ds
No consensus made yet.
But I still think that gerund-gerund would be incorrect.</p>
<p>@hula755
First i put “the influence that”
But i changed it to “advises” since it’s a tense issue now not an awkward issue.</p>
<p>@ hula, that was analyzed to analyze because of tense parallelism. The entire passage is in present tense so it doesn’t make sense to change it up to past.</p>
<p>Thanks, guys… I answered analyze as well but wasn’t quite sure.</p>