<p>Mozart question was two gerunds without a semicolon. Don’t remember the sentence, though. last math problem was 1350 if i recall correctly</p>
<p>and yes I got 24 for the median problem as well</p>
<p>can someone please clarify to me what the correct answer was for the swimmers grammar question? was the error stand or no error?</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure stand was wrong. Not 100%, though. i actually put E on the test but i think i’m wrong -_-</p>
<p>I still think its E.
“I dont stand a chance if I don’t prepare”
“I stand a chance if I do”
^i think both of those statements are grammatically correct. Just like there are multiple ways to complete sentences using gerunds, present tense, etc. , there CAN be more than one tense to use. And if it’s not WRONG ( even if there’s another answer) the answer should be E</p>
<p>At any rate, has anyone even seen the PSAT test the “if…will” so esotericly and sneakily? I can’t recal one instance, and I’ve done a LOT of tests… They’ve been more blatant when they were tested. I think the emphasis on the question was “Jamie and me”</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Can anyone explain to me why the Indian passage was puzzled… intrigued? More importantly, why was dubious… deferential incorrect? Dubious means to be curious and questioning, and deferential means to show respect.</p></li>
<li><p>I put seminal for the sentence completion too, but why was it seminal?</p></li>
<li><p>One of the improving paragraphs question had a question asking what word should be added to a sentence. I don’t remember exactly, but the answer choices were “likewise” and “therefore”. I put therefore, anyone else?</p></li>
<li><p>Also, the “… findings, selecting and amplifying” one was confusing because of misplaced modifiers. I don’t think that was the answer because that’d mean findings was selecting and amplifying.</p></li>
<li><p>One of the writing questions, “research on” was incorrect right? I’m pretty sure it’s “research in”</p></li>
</ol>
<p>Both research in and Research on are correct, there was no error in the phrase “research on”</p>
<p>Hope did you do the last math grid in?</p>
<p>Sent from my HTC One X using CC</p>
<p>*how</p>
<p>Sent from my HTC One X using CC</p>
<p>Um, do you remember what the problem was? If you can tell me what it was about, I probably could remember it. (I got 3500 but I forgot what the question was.)</p>
<p>And also, did anyone else get 20 twice in a row for the grid-ins? I think I screwed up… :(</p>
<p>guys if you go through the thread your question will probably have been discussed already! 
like the last grid in</p>
<p>what were the other choices for the vocab that had “given to platitude”? I know for sure i didnt put that, but im not sure what i put…</p>
<p>@EternityBlazer I think there were options like “disposed to…sophistry” and “adverse to…cliches”.</p>
<p>@windowpainting and @heyhihello i know! why does california have a bad education system but one of the highest national merit cut off scores? I should just move to wyoming, then i only need a 200.</p>
<p>@LadyRainicorn
thanks! do u know what the right answer is?</p>
<p>@fash123 i know right… D: & i don’t get why it’s done by state either! so strange</p>
<p>for a sentence comp question that asked about scientific equipment and it being blank for so many years; typically it only breaks down due to blank usage
was it RELIABLE and improper?
or FUNCTIONAL and something else?
i was deciding between the two and then rationalized that it could still be unreliable before it breaks down, but not functional, so i went with functional !</p>
<p>I think it was reliable + improper</p>
<p>Wow there’s only 1.8% chance that someone will become a NMS or is it 1.5%</p>
<p>@EternityBlazer The right answer was probably “given to…platitudes”.</p>