<p>
</p>
<p>Well, you attacked us a bit after this comment.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Half those views might have been yours. and the other half may have been the regular students who saw this thread and were tired of typing up the same thing.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Precisely the problem. You haven’t provided any credible source for the source of your quotes (see below) or your research (see below).</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>You asked us to verify information…which is data.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Quotes…information…data.</p>
<p>
A lot of the current students posted in those “outdated” threads.</p>
<p>I think you may have posted with good intent but you went awry in 2 places. </p>
<ol>
<li>You had this line before your question.
</p>
<p>That detracted from your question: tolerance of hate crimes, not necessarily restricted to racism.</p>
<ol>
<li>The wording of your question. How are we supposed to argue the validity (or lack thereof) of something we haven’t seen? </li>
</ol>
<p>Again, I think you had good intentions but just chose the wrong route in approaching the question. I hope the information I posted helped you. Cheers.</p>