<p>I’ll let you guys in on a secret. I might seem erudite, and sagacious, and scholarly, but AP books bore me. </p>
<p>I look at the walls of text, and on a good day, I might be able to crunch through a few dozen pages. On a bad day, I won’t even be able to retain a paragraph. </p>
<p>So I was thinking - wouldn’t AP books be a lot more accessible if they were interactive? That is, the paragraphs are still there, but there are simply blanks where you have to fill in the key word, concept, or phrase? E.g. consider this:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I just think that writing an AP book in the style above would make it so much more conduit to learning. Looking at a wall of text doesn’t help me learn. </p>
<p>But if I am forced to think about the material while reading, I would retain the material much better. There is a difference between blankly staring at a page and absorbing in information. Obviously, the correct answers to the blanks would be in the appendix. And this would be so easy to do; the authors just have to go through the book, delete the key words, and make an appendix with all the right words.</p>
<p>This would easily defeat my usual technique of merely skimming through an AP review book and thinking that I know everything. Because that’s what I do. I skim through by looking at the section headings and quickly scanning the text - and think “oh, I’ve already covered the properties of water in class; I know it. Oh, I’ve already gone over taxonomy, I know it, etc.” This would defeat skimming and actually put your knowledge to the test. </p>
<p>The answers, in order, are: Proteins, dehydration synthesis, water, membranes, enzymes, channel proteins.</p>