<p>To quote a portion of the article that explains these rankings…</p>
<p>“NEWSWEEK devised a ranking of global universities that takes into account openness and diversity, as well as distinction in research. We evaluated schools on some of the measures used in well-known rankings published by Shanghai Jiaotong University and the Times of London Higher Education Survey. Fifty percent of the score came from equal parts of three measures used by Shanghai Jiatong: the number of highly-cited researchers in various academic fields, the number of articles published in Nature and Science, and the number of articles listed in the ISI Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities indices. Another 40 percent of the score came from equal parts of four measures used by the Times: the percentage of international faculty, the percentage of international students, citations per faculty member (using ISI data), and the ratio of faculty to students. The final 10 percent came from library holdings (number of volumes).” </p>
<p>I read the article in its entirety and am quite proud to say I attend Berkeley, with no sarcasm in that statement. Go Bears!</p>
<p>Sweet! This must mean I’m going to be more successful than any students from Cambridge, MIT, Oxford, UCSF and Columbia! Yay, I’m going to call my mom right now and tell her the good news :D</p>
<p>Yeah, it ain’t…They say it’s a ‘tier-two’ of Non-Ivies.</p>
<p>I believe some other academic powerhouses are not listed: UChicago, Duke, Stanford, etc. I’m too lazy to doublecheck this. So basically, it’s pretty much assumed we are on par with the Ivies </p>