<p>Got a problem with attracting students to courses in your department? Try renaming the class with an intriguing name. Who wouldn’t find their curiousity piqued by The Economics of Sin, for example?</p>
<p>I don’t like this trend. Students should stop being lazy and checking syllabus and/or course description! For Dean’s sake: you’re in college choosing courses, not in the Movie Teather picking a movie to watch!</p>
<p>I have taken classes like that. A class on religious dissension/witchcraft in the Atlantic World was called: HST 311: Witchcraft, Demons, and Divination. I had visions of Hogwarts and Harry Potter in my head. Obviously I was thwarted in that respect, but it still was my favorite class of college.</p>
<p>I don’t have a problem with it. As long as it doesnt devolve into doublespeak- ie private contractors or mercenaries in Iraq, if a sexy sounding name makes it more attractive ( would you pay to see a burlesque show given by Bertha Hudpucker?), then it will attract a more diverse group of students.
That sounds like an advantage for any class.</p>
<p>I don’t however appreciate things like " Rocks for Jocks", when it is assumed that athletes aren’t intelligent enough for a regular lab course, but there aren’t any similar literature classes for those who less than literary.</p>
<p>My writing class is about Blasphemy and Religion, God, Sex, and the Human Body (something like that) and that’s why I signed up for it.</p>
<p>It’s writing about literature which I hate, but I’ve enjoyed it very much thus far. So I think the title did a good job in getting someone who otherwise would’ve avoided the class to enroll and enjoy it.</p>
<p>I agree!
*So an attention grabbing headline is a good tactic, as long as it is backed up with a clear account of the course content. *</p>
<p>I have a microbiology course called infections of leisure – the content would be similar regardless of the title, but the titles makes them look at the course descripton.</p>