<p>I am always sorry when it seems to me that comments that are meant in the general are read by some people to their specifics.<br>
Obviously, on a forum such as this, there is no way to “measure” people’s attributes - be it their talent, their drive, their perseverance, their intelligence, their physique, their training. I know of a girl who took tap at a “local” studio, who after 10 years of study couldn’t come close to what my daughter received in 3 years at a more intensive program. So, when you read other people’s “statistics” and try to compare to your child’s, it can be very misleading. Add in the fact that there are no absolutes - it’s not like a standardized test - “you score in the 97th percentile of all MT students”
And - what one set of auditors may love leaves another set totally cold. Some students who enter programs have little experience - some who get only rejections have resumes a mile long.</p>
<p>The cold, hard truth is that I know kids who are auditioning for MT programs that just do not have what it takes to get an acceptance. And, hard though it is to make that call, someone who has worked with them probably needs to be very honest in their assessment. And, if the student, the parents, or the teacher think the people whose judgement they are trusting may not have the knowledge to tell - check other vocal or acting coaches who may have a better feel for it.
That is NOT to say, however, that everyone who didn’t get in anywhere doesn’t have the talent. The many things that enter into who gets accepted where have been discussed many places previously. It could be that a person who got only rejections didn’t really apply at schools that were a good match. There could have been problems with their audition material. Bless those schools who will provide students with feedback - none of my D’s auditioning schools did so!
But - if a student gets only rejection letters, there has to be a period of self-assessment - was I really at the top of my audition game? If not - why not? Did I not take it seriously enough? Prepare enough? Not have enough training/ background/ knowledge to make good choices? If I WAS as thoroughly prepared as I could be, and I had a good mix of schools (not all top-tier), then I think it has to go back to whether this is a field I should be trying to enter. It’s been said that many of the top schools “cast their classes”, according to their need, but they also want to graduate students will be marketable, not only to preserve their reputations as training schools, but also in the long-term best interests of the students.
Not every kid who plays high school football gets the opportunity to play in college - and of the ones who go on to play college ball, only a fraction of them can make a career of it. Not every kid who has a good time being in their high school shows can go on to a career in MT. However, they CAN choose a college where they can continue their passion without majoring in it. Some schools cast only MT majors in shows - some, they are open to the entire school. Likewise, there aren’t many outlets for people to play football throughout their adult lives - there are tons of places for people to perform - church and civic choirs, community theatres, cabaret style entertainment… and some people make these choices, NOT based on talent level, but based on lifestyle. Not everyone wants to be a starving actor waiting tables all their lives. Or spend 5 weeks working, then 6 months looking for the next job. Or live out of a suitcase, city to city, for months on end. Or, they may want to do that for a while, but then decide they want a more stable life.</p>
<p>I agree that many people who don’t get acceptances don’t continue to post, and that it would probably be good for future students if some would. What choices did they have at that point? What options did they pursue? Did they prepare differently, and re-audition?<br>
And - I will say that while obviously those of you who had multiple acceptances have every right to be proud of same, I thought there were a few posters who probably were a little “over-the-top” in their exuberance, and if your child wasn’t meeting with any success, it could be taken as them rubbing it in. While that may not have been the intention, if your child is being bruised by the process, that may have been how you took it. So - for this year’s auditioners, please share good news and bad, but try to do it in a way that won’t seem to diminish others’ efforts.
And, parents, please try to develop the same slightly thickened skin your child needs for the audition process, and not take things personally that weren’t intended that way. If there is a post that is out of line, notify the moderator and it will be removed. If it is your perception that it was hurtful, but it wasn’t really directed personally at you - see if re-reading it without layering your situation on it gives you a different perspective of it.
This whole process is tough enough without any extra stress thrown in!</p>