<p>I’m finished with school (well, organized school, anyway… hehe) – BA from UW-Madison, MBA from Belmont. My future wife and I are getting a head start at evaluating schools and we’d love for our children to have the opportunity to attend fine schools such as those that comprise the bulk of the Ivy League. I have seen plenty of analyses and rankings based on numbers; what I ask of you is to comment on what I have heretofore gleaned in terms of the qualitative features of them – and some of this is the regurgitation of what I’ve read on other threads on this site. No offense to Cornell people, but we are looking mostly at the other seven Ivies.</p>
<p>So here’s what I think – listing a couple perceived strengths and then a perceived weakness. Please let me know:</p>
<p>Princeton
- Great all-around liberal arts, math/economics, sciences, and social sciences.
- Focused on undergrads… lots of money invested in each student… lots of face time with professors.
- Deflated grading makes it very hard to get really good grades. Here C really is “average”.</p>
<p>Harvard
- Along with Princeton, best all-around undergrad programs.
- Sophisticated social hierarchies and built-in leadership training structure; competition.
- TAs teach a lot of undergrad classes.</p>
<p>Yale
- Best creative/humanities programs
- Excellent pre-law and poli sci
- Elevated crime stats compared to other Ivies</p>
<p>Columbia
- Excellent, rigorous core curriculum.
- Excellent for pre-med, journalism, education.
- Probably the least undergrad-centered of the Ivies.</p>
<p>Brown
- Highly flexible curriculum
- Fairly laid back, happy students
- (but…) Lack of a sense of community</p>
<p>Penn
- Top-notch business programs
- Pre-professional setting (pro)
- Pre-professional setting (con)</p>
<p>Dartmouth
- Top-notch language programs
- Undergrad-centered, like Princeton
- In the middle of nowhere (some would call this a pro, of course…)</p>