<p>I took an F in Economic because even though I got A’s on the tests, I never showed up to class and didn’t turn in the homework so that led me to just take an F so I can replace it. I’m going to be applying to UCLA in the fall under Business Economics/Communications. As long as I get A’s the rest of the way, I will be ending up with a 3.82, but if they average out the econ grade, I’ll end up with a 3.71. I’ve heard UCLA will take the replaced grade, but I’ve also heard they average out the grades. I thought private universities and colleges averaged.</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure UCs take the A, I dont think they average it. Both grades will appear on transcript but only the A will play into your GPA (if you’re taking the same class over).</p>
<p>^^ ***… if that’s the case then wouldn’t it be better to take an F and retake for an A over a B!? That doesn’t make sense. On high school transcripts you would have the replaced grade with the denotation “R” next to the grade, indicating that the class was repeated. At a school as competitive as UCLA for admissions, it would seriously surprise me if a F–>A was simply seen as an A</p>
<p>my bad for misphrasing it. the transcript will show both F and A. However, only the A will count toward the GPA and they will totally ignore the F he received when calculating the GPA. However, because the UCLA adcom will still see the F in your transcript, they won’t see it as a good thing.</p>
<p>True. But if you are getting a C, I recommend you to try your best in the Final and try to get at least a B. I’ve seen people (who’s getting a C) who just decide to not show up for the Final, get D/F, and retake the course and get an A. Personally, I think taking the course once and getting a B is better than doing a terrible job (whether on purpose or not) on the first try and getting a “fake A” on the second try.</p>