research experience

<p>I was just wondering, is research experience (Intel,etc) very important for admission to MIT? I’m applying to MIT Sloan undergrad business program plus maybe an additional math major.</p>

<p>First, you do not apply to a specific school at MIT as an undergraduate. All the prospective Sloan students are considered under the same criteria as the prospective scientists and the prospective engineers.</p>

<p>Research is a great EC to have when applying to MIT, but it is certainly not required, and applicants without research experience are not at an automatic disadvantage.</p>

<p>Incidentally, associate director of admissions [Matt</a> McGann](<a href=“http://matt.mitblogs.com%5DMatt”>http://matt.mitblogs.com) answered both of these questions in his latest [blog</a> entry](<a href=“http://matt.mitblogs.com/archives/2006/07/july_questions_1.html]blog”>http://matt.mitblogs.com/archives/2006/07/july_questions_1.html):

</p>

<p>I see. Thanks a lot.</p>

<p>Does this mean that research experience is a big plus when it comes to admissions?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Well, it certainly isn’t likely to hurt you! :slight_smile: Research experience can be used to demonstrate many, many important qualities that MIT looks for - academic ability, passion, work ethic, creativity, risk-taking…yeah, it can be a big plus, especially if you play it up well. Of course, if you don’t have research opportunities, you can demonstrate all these attributes in other ways - like Matt said, lack of research experience doesn’t disadvantage you. But it’s certainly convenient to have something that by itself can show so many of your positive qualities!</p>