<p>I have to admit that I’d describe my childrearing style as consensual. To be clear, until this thread inspired me to google an article a few minutes ago, I had never read anything associated with “consensual parenting”, but as someone raised with a lot of Quaker influences, the idea of looking for consensus guides a lot of my thinking, both at home, and in my classroom. </p>
<p>To me, parenting by consensus means that we think about everybody’s needs and everybody’s wants when we decide, together, what to do. </p>
<p>I see a fair number of parents who seem to parent in one of 3 ways:</p>
<p>1) Parent is the dictator. Their decision always wins, because they’re bigger and they have more power.</p>
<p>2) Child is the dictator. Their decision always wins, because the child is viewed as too fragile or too precious or something . . . </p>
<p>3) Control goes back and forth between parent and child, with lots of power struggles.</p>
<p>Consensual parenting, as I practice it, is based on the idea that there are solutions that can take into account both people’s needs, wants, and feelings. Now, to be clear, consensus doesn’t mean that everyone is always happy, it just means that both sides are comfortable with the outcome. It certainly doesn’t mean that one side is always happy at the expense of the other. </p>
<p>So, I might say to my child “We need to go to the dentist today so I can get my teeth clean.”, and my child might say “I don’t want to go to the dentist. The dentist is boring.” and I’d say “That’s true, it can be boring at the dentist, but I need to get my teeth cleaned and the dentist is planning to see me at 10:30. What can we do to solve this problem?” and together we’d come up with a solution like: I could bring some books to read to him in the waiting room, or we could stop at the park on the way home, or he could bring his Leapster handheld game. To me those are compromises, mutual agreements that we could live with. It’s also important to note that the outcome (me and my child at the dentist, with a couple of books and a Leapster) is pretty much the same outcome that parent 1 might have come to (Coming to the dentist is not a choice, now go get your Leapster and wait in the car) or parent 2 might have come to (Now darling, how about if I read you a story at the dentist? 2 stories? 3? How about 3 stories and a trip to the park, you like the park, don’t you?), it’s just the road we traveled to get there that was different. </p>
<p>As far as if my child outright refused? Well, of course that could happen, but to be honest it didn’t happen very often. If it did (or does, since I still parent this way), the first thing I’d do is look into why. Maybe there’s an underlying reason that we can solve. In the end, though, going to the dentist is a need, and not being bored is a want, and we take care of needs first, so we’d go. On the other hand, if he woke up in the morning and just didn’t feel like going to the grocery store as I planned, we might have worked out a solution where we went to the park instead and then stopped for groceries on the way home. </p>
<p>As far as restaurants? My kid knew, from a very early age, that just like he needed to show consideration for my needs and wants and feelings, he should do the same for other people around him. If we went somewhere moderately fancy he’d know that adults were there because they wanted a certain kind of environment, and that he needed to respect their feelings. If I felt like he was getting a little rambunctious, I’d whisper to him and point out people’s faces, either “I don’t think that lady liked it when your voice got loud. I think she was hoping for a quiet evening, what can you do instead of talking loudly, would you like me to tell you a story, or get the crayons out of my purse?” or “I can tell you want to move your body, but I’m worried that if you bounce the booth will move and it will bother the nice people behind us. Would you like to go for a little walk while we wait for our food to arrive?”</p>
<p>I know someone reading this is now thinking “well that’s fine for CuriousKid, but it never would have worked for my kid”, to which I’ll say perhaps that’s true. Perhaps how you parent wouldn’t have for CK either. I am a pretty pragmatic person. I suspect that if what I was doing hadn’t worked, I would have done something else.</p>
I have been a single parent for years now, which propelled me to juggle many things on my own, including getting out of the house with three kids to three schools and me to my office, so I became very comfortable managing all that as simply as possible, like when the clock says 8:00 we are out the door, not because I said so, simply because that was how our life worked, and too many things depended on that for any wiggle room. They got that, as I’m sure all of our kids do and it flowed. </p>