<p>I only hope that he was wearing a Trojan… </p>
<p>[USC</a> fraternity official ‘appalled’ by photos of couple having sex on rooftop [Updated] | L.A. NOW | Los Angeles Times](<a href=“Archive blogs”>Archive blogs)</p>
<p>I read the story. It isn’t clear to me who took the photos. If the couple or either of them posted, that’s awful. </p>
<p>However, if they had sex on the roof and someone else filmed and posted it without their knowledge, then I think the photographer is the one who should be getting into trouble. </p>
<p>I’m not condoing what the couple did, but is it possible that they thought the rooftop was private and never dreamed someone was filming them?</p>
<p>If someone posted the photos without the consent of both people involved, it’s appalling.</p>
<p>Otherwise, what’s the big deal? </p>
<p>Have we all gotten so stuffy that we can’t acknowledge the possibility that two people might enjoy having sex in an unconventional location – or might resort to doing so because they both live in double rooms?</p>
<p>Seriously. What is the big deal? The only issue here is privacy violation. Then again, if you do something in public and are photographed, what are the rules?</p>
<p>The reason I think it perhaps may be a newsworthy story is that less than 1 month ago another ALLEGED member of this same fraternity (Kappa Sigma) wrote that inflamatory letter about women and now a member of the same fraternity is on top of the roof having sex. Entirely different situation. The story about the letter that was sent out a month ago is much worse. This latest is not as big a deal, imo, but it could be something that needs looking into.</p>