But as a human being, I can only hope to show the kind of compassion that that man has shown to others. And that I can teach my children to have a fraction of his generosity of spirit, his basic human kindness.
Without getting too political, I think in many ways Jimmy Cater was too decent a human being to be president. As a human being he had a lot more compassion for others and lived into his faith rather than using it as a battering ram to divide people, and for that he should be remembered. If anyone wanted to ask me how a person of faith should act, a model, he would be a pretty good one, instead of using his faith as a battering ram to denigrate other people, he seemed to try to live into it.
Sad news. I wonder how aggressively this will be treated given his age vs being a former President. I hope he’s being kept comfortable and surrounded by loved ones.
@musicprnt totally agree. I read a biography about him when I was in college and ended up with the utmost respect for him, not realizing how intelligent he really was…as I didn’t care about politics in H.S.
I don’t feel bad for a guy who has reached 90 years of age. You have to die of something.
About Carter:
Under-rated in some aspects as a President, notably in economic performance. Outside the oil price shocks that knocked down demand/employment/production while inflating costs, the US had better growth than during Reagan. (And I voted against Carter both times.)
Lousy at foreign policy. His idea of isolating himself in the White House as protest against the Iranians' defiling the US embassy and taking Americans hostage was some sort of quasi-religious absurdist piece of non-theater. (I don't blame Carter for the Iran mess, btw. I blame the Iranians.)
A micromanager who tended to hire immature bleeps. Examples were notorious: top advisor looking down Jehan Sadat dress and referring to her breasts as the "pyramids along the Nile" (or the like) is just one that comes to mind. But what really sticks out is these dopes couldn't get along for basic stuff like, yes, when they'd use the White House tennis court so the freaking President of the US would make out the tennis court schedule. There's a phrase for that: misuse of time, as in "as President, isn't there something else to do?" SNL sort of made fun of this by having Dan Ackroyd as Jimmy the nuclear engineer taking calls and talking down a guy who took some pills by having him specifically identify the pills and the side effects, etc. I think his problems with people ran deep: he had a great need to forgive, which is nice but that makes it hard to be the big boss, and he also didn't want to offend. I remember when his standard was no one like the old "war horses" Brezinski and Vance but then that's exactly who we got.
Did great stuff with Habitat. There is no way to understate the effect of a President taking up a hammer and doing work to help people. Reagan would cut wood but on his own ranch.
Allowed the Carter Center to be used by an array of lousy regimes because it tended to fall into the trap that it's much easier to identify problems and issues when truth and access isn't suppressed. This led to statements about elections that became less believable over time.
@Lergnom, you aren’t giving Carter discredit for choosing G William Miller as Fed Chairman?
Greenspan did not understand human behavior so he is the worst Fed Chair in our lifetimes…
Miller was atrocious. That was Carter’s pick. Blumenthal was terrible too as treasury secretary.
Carter did eventually choose Volcker who was the best Fed Chairman but the damage was done.
Carter is a great human being, but as a president…not very good.
“I don’t feel bad for a guy who has reached 90 years of age. You have to die of something.”
I do feel sorry and sad. I’d rather die of a quick heart attack or something like that than suffer the agony of slow death while being eaten alive by cancer.
I don’t think anyone here is saying that Carter hasn’t had a long and full life. But even though he’s 90, we can regret that he is facing an illness that may be a miserable experience.
<<<
I don’t feel bad for a guy who has reached 90 years of age. You have to die of something.
[QUOTE=""]
[/QUOTE]
True, but cancer can be painful and miserable. I hope that he can be kept comfortable. That will be a relief for him and his family.
[QUOTE=""]
Did great stuff with Habitat. There is no way to understate the effect of a President taking up a hammer and doing work to help people. Reagan would cut wood but on his own ranch.
[/QUOTE]
I have different expectations for someone who leaves office in his late 50s than I do for someone who leaves office in his late 70s. lol
My dad died at 62. I wish he’d lived to 90 and died of cancer, no matter how painful. I know he would have wanted the same because he never even knew all his grandchildren. So yeah, it’s too bad but the guy is 90.
As for Miller, he was sooo completely wrong it’s not funny. But he wasn’t Fed chair for long and was out-voted. The issue was more complicated than hindsight tends to say: we had these oil price shocks from OPEC embargoes and there was rational discussion about whether killing inflation was more right than trying to preserve demand and investment by keeping rates low. The point is that was a unique period of absolute cost-driven inflation, not wage-driven but resource component-driven, and the Fed didn’t know what to do. Turned out they took the cautious approach - keep rates low - and that didn’t work so Volcker and the board voted to raise rates to squash the inflationary spiral. Two points: this was a peculiar episode not some measure of macroeconomic concepts in which OPEC asserted control of resources and it wasn’t just Volcker but the Fed board that voted to raise rates. We tend to give credit and assign blame based on the Chair but he’s a vote not THE vote.
It’s crazy though that everyone in his immediate family - both of his parents and all his siblings - had pancreatic cancer. I read an article about this a few years ago, how medical researchers had studied his family to see if genetic abnormalities could explain the occurrences. So far, nothing. Carter himself says that the only difference between him and the rest of the family, health-wise, was cigarette smoking - he’s a non-smoker.
On the news the other night, it was reported that people with three or more family members who have had pancreatic cancer are 57 times more likely to themselves develop pancreatic cancer than are other individuals.
In my church we have a group of people who help parishioners discover their gifts. They identified my gift as “encouragement”. I would encourage the owners of this thread to develop a way to register “unhelpful” specifically for one post on this thread. Humanity does, and always will, transcend politics.