<p>There are four different diagonals that go through the center of the cube. You can create a 3D model using cardboard and toothpicks.</p>
<p>So either Dr. Chung made a mistake or he was trying to ask how many OTHER diagonals have the same length. But that is not how the question is worded. So I think that this would be an error in the book.</p>
<p>Whether you thought the answer was 3 or 4, there is nothing wrong with your 3d visualization. They just did not make clear whether they meant for you to count XY in the total. From their answer, we can reverse-engineer it to figure out that they did not mean for you to count XY, BUT THEY DID NOT SAY THAT! I think they mis-used the word “different” as in “how many different” when they should have said “other”. (Or maybe they felt they had to say “different” so you would not count XY and YX as separate diagonals. Not sure who would do that…)</p>
<p>And (1 minute later) I agree with knowthestuff</p>
<p>Hmmm…I think XY is the same length as XY, and it’s different from the other 3. So I would count it based on the wording of the question. But what do I know? Lol</p>
<p>Eliza, surely you have some cardboard around. Perhaps you have an old manila folder or some old index cards. Find some toothpicks, plastic straws, or anything else that has the shape of a rod.</p>
<p>Cut the cardboard into 5 squares of the same size. Tape the squares together so that you form a cube with an open top. To create your diagonal, lay the toothpick or straw from a corner at the top to the farthest corner at the bottom. Repeat this for the three remaining top corners. You will be able to see the four diagonals.</p>
<p>The only thing worse than using any of those error-laden synthetic tests is wasting time deciphering what the so-called author meant, or where his mistakes are.</p>
<p>Actually, there IS something worse, namely learning and remembering a lesson that is absolutely wrong. </p>
<p>This could be Exhibit 21,022 for the case “Why nobody should use non-official tests!”</p>