<p>would we all get +10 if a question gets thrown out or what. cuz if we do, im going to email them about this question and see what they say. yeah its only me who thinks its frank but its worth a shot.</p>
<p>so how many q were there in total??
63?? or 67??</p>
<p>23+20+24= 67 questions i believe</p>
<p>67… I think… I missed about 12… omitted 4… ???</p>
<p>@ yetti</p>
<p>if we manage to get a question thrown out then if u get it wrong it will not count against u…essentially every1 gets it correct…</p>
<p>so def email them!! and post email and resposne!!</p>
<p>Wait, the rhetoric question from the Chemistry passage…anybody wanna remind me what the question/answers were? :</p>
<p>Also in archaeologist passage, there was question on the photographer and his thoughts. What was the answer or answer choices. I put flustered in new situation originally, but I changed it to something about how he was not used to photographing old people since the passage said he did know “how to photograph the fissures and angles of my face” or something like that and he routinely took pictures of younger people</p>
<p>About that question on rhetoric, my answer choice was the one about rhetoric being an enticing yet forbidden attraction for students. At least I thought it was right, because the way Sandro used to quickly rebuke him when he ‘slipped’ into rhetoric seemed to point to this answer.</p>
<p>jw, has collegeboard thrown out (like not count) a question in recent memories?</p>
<p>Oh for the photography one i said it was because he was flustered.</p>
<p>i put flustered for the photographer one. and for the rhetoric, i put it was academically insufficient</p>
<p>@nytimes92: I put flustered; the old people choice used the word averse, which means dislike, and that was not supported in the passage</p>
<p>The rhetoric one I put something about it not being a useful tool.</p>
<p>well this is greattt. everyone put various answers for almost everry question.</p>
<p>what about for the chemistry one, what did he feel about chemistry at the age of 20?</p>
<p>^^idealized</p>
<p>Does anybody remember all the choices for the rhetoric question?</p>
<p>so</p>
<p>sc</p>
<p>incapable of
compunction
cognitive
expuragate…offensive??
alliance
plummet… infinitestimal
axiom
particular… universal
platitudinous… permissible
erode
essence…incarnation
superfluous
what were other 7 q??</p>
<p>short passage
chinese
kinship
importance of family
piano/prodigy
sardonic</p>
<p>arcaheologist</p>
<p>metaphor
photographer-flustered
contentious
flippant
provocative
characterize
cavalier
lack academic in her book
to prove a point of view
representation</p>
<p>louisiana black american about literature</p>
<p>inflated style (insincere sentiment?)
repetition
childhood memory or trace literary pursuit
details
faithful representation</p>
<p>chemistry </p>
<p>bookish
not much real life knowledge
difference has lots to offer in relationship
idealized
rhetoric- it wasn’t a good way?</p>
<p>double passage about celebrity</p>
<p>mildly ridiculous?
hold= maintain (grasp??)
trapping - superficial appearance
serious- thoughtful
dismay
modern america is influenced by celebrity
important in career
unfortunate acquiesce
critique a trend/reemphasize a point
conspicuous
passage 2 is more personal</p>
<p>i know many are controversial
and am not sure about some Q’s</p>
<p>anymore??</p>
<p>and what was the answer for large and lumpy q?</p>
<p>conspicuous is what I’ve been hearing</p>
<p>what was the q with the answer “incapable of”?</p>
<p>ye awhat is the incapable of q?</p>
<p>Its not importance of family… its how close her family was… she mentioned her uncles, aunts etc… where as in the states, she was an individual.</p>