<p>incapable one was where one type of bird could fly a few yards or something but another one was incapable of flying at all.</p>
<p>@Lobzz - I believe that was the best answer detailing her family; what did you put?</p>
<p>Now I remember the bird one, incapable was correct.</p>
<p>i’m pretty sure she realized the importance of family because she didn’t seem to realize that in NYC but she did when she visited her family in Beijing</p>
<p>academically insufficient is correct.</p>
<p>“Incapable of” must be experimental.</p>
<p>I also remember importance of family or something like that,but do not remember other choices.</p>
<p>Nah, incapable was not experimental. It said something like wild turkeys can fly, but domestic turkeys are incapable of this.</p>
<p>@thequestionmark: was the academically insufficient one the answer about why the colleagues didn’t like the publications?</p>
<p>im pretty sure that there was incapable of question because i didn’t have a CR dummy but got that question
you prolly do not remeber bc it was the first question and ridiculously easy.</p>
<p>@1a1: that was exactly it-it was two types of turkeys one could fly, one could not.
and not experimental</p>
<p>@1a1
i think it was about the archaeologist that her book lacked the academic stuff</p>
<p>Oh. I remember about the turkeys now… sounds right.</p>
<p>I don’t remember where it was from… I just know I put it and it was right. Some of the other answers were real extreme.</p>
<p>plz are there any other sc questions that you guys remember??
even the extremely easy questions…</p>
<p>how did you guys do the what does passage 1 think about passage 2, the celebrity pair passages? " undermine the authority of the publisher?"</p>
<p>@genie17: do you mean the plagiarism one? I put Passage 2 views the problem in Passage 1 as inexcusable.</p>
<p>for the plagiarism passage,
what was the answer for the first question about it?
some of the answers was plagiarism among the professors and reactions to it
i think
was it the reaction??</p>
<p>with regards to the question about tooting my own horn, i believe the exact phrasing was tooting my own paper horn. In context, this remark by the author is meant to be taken lightly and most definitely not conceited…especially since he says my one PAPER horn which is a much less impressive substance than say an ivory horn…if that makes sense to anyone.</p>
<p>@1a1: I think the plagiarism one is the pair short passages. passage 1 is acquiescent, while passage 2 thinks it a felony. i don’t remember what i put down, but i think inexcusable is correct.
the celebrity one has one question with choices of something like ’ undermine the authority of the publisher", " forget about loyal readers" and refuse to educate the public. which one did you choose?</p>
<p>I dont remember the rest of the choices, but I know “undermine the publisher” was not the right choice.</p>
<p>I think you’re thinking about the archaeologist question about the author’s publications - I put that they were lacking in academic substance and that is why they were not looked highly upon by colleagues?</p>
<p>^ i said that, too. that it lacked academic substance</p>
<p>does anyone know the answer to my previous q?
also for the celebrity double passage
there was a question about the guy who made the list
i can’t remember the question exactly
but it had sth about not meeting the expectation as one of the answer choices
did i get it right?</p>
<p>can some1 answer my ****ing question</p>
<p>wut was “bookish” in reference to and wut were the other options?</p>