<p>Gay Azn Panda,</p>
<p>I was stuck between youthful confusion and organizing argument… i picked youthful confusion though becuz i didn’t seem to find something like that in her questions…</p>
<p>Prob wrong tho cuz i spent like 3 minutes trying to figure it out…</p>
<p>ok good
yeah me too, but i’m think that section might be experimental
elaborate on the referee question?</p>
<p>i dont remember if i put lifelong questioning or youthful confusion . . . she did specify multiple times how she wasn’t sure why she was in the field of art history, lending credibility to the answer of “youthful confusion” since it was a question for herself . . . but “lifelong” makes it a bit odd</p>
<p>as for the astronauts on the moon, i don’t understand why people put laconic.</p>
<p>it was something along the lines of many astronaut explorations were anything but expansive, but on the contrary, many of the reports were _______"</p>
<p>laconic means “terse”, so it WOULD correspond with inexpansive missions since there’s nothing to talk about; on the other hand, “histrionic”, affected and fluffed up, would contradict the seemingly bland exploration</p>
<p>anyone agree?</p>
<p>@congster i’m pretty sure it was fortuitous/potion…but i could be wrong</p>
<p>on the side note, gay azn panda–you have an epic name sir.</p>
<p>I got idiosyncratic too… also was the second paragraph for the Trojan space passage trying to provide information about it mentioned in the first paragraph?</p>
<p>lol i picked lifelong questioning cuz her confusion wasn’t really lifelong? it was more during her youth than it was on that point b/c she changed at the end of the passage and stopped questioning herself</p>
<p>fortuitous means mental strength, so it doesn’t make sense. It’s final: serendipity/elixir</p>
<p>the passage said something like… a referee is needed to settle all disputes (the scientist passage) and the question was like… the use of the referee emphasizes the need for what? i put objectivity</p>
<p>haha thank you
i would like to remark that i am neither gay nor asian
however i am a panda</p>
<p>no it wasnt fortuitous it was fortitude i believe. and umm the referee i put the one with conflict…</p>
<p>@somebo123 Yeah hopefully perfect 1600 this time around. Just a little worried about some CR questions</p>
<p>@panda I put lifelong because there was nothing that indicated that her self-doubt was lifelong. You can’t assume that.</p>
<p>@keumyong1 I think it was closer to “Astronauts’ exploration reports were hardly expansive; on the contrary, many of them were laconic.”</p>
<p>Either way what type of scientific report is ever histrionic? That doesn’t fit</p>
<p>@u9u99u9 It was objectivity</p>
<p>yep i’m pretty sure it was objectivity
none of the others were close to being right</p>
<p>i dont think objectivity works because it was talking about how the scientists kept going until experiments settle the “conflicts” basically between them. did anyone put something else?</p>
<p>Did anyone get the one where it was like; ab=33 and bc=21, what is the value of abc??
I didnt even know where to start -__-</p>
<p>it was 7 x 3 x 11 = 231. thats what i got</p>
<p>you multiply the two and get ab^2 times c equals 693
do a prime factorization of 693 and the only primes you get are 3, 11, and 7 so a b and c have to be them</p>
<p>i put objectivity too.</p>
<p>wait guys… it didnt claim to need a referee… it compared the experiments to referees. The experiments served as the ultimate referee… that emphasizes objectivity how? i thought it emphasized the conflicts they had…</p>
<p>damn did i get that wrong… crap.</p>