<p>:(
What do you think my score will be if I missed around 15 and left 10 blank? That’s…55 - 10(0.25) = raw score right? Hopefully I didn’t miss that many, but never know!</p>
<p>-10 -15 - extra 5 = -30… that’s a 650, makin it rain. (this is from the -5 = 800 curve by the way)</p>
<p>what was a raw score of 69 on the jan one? anyone know?</p>
<p>approximately a 750-760.</p>
<p>this hard is so hard that i have no idea how to do em</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>yeah, it was what would not be considered evidence.</p>
<p>So what was</p>
<p>Number of atoms in reaction (I think it was like photosynthesis or something?)
I remember some of the answers being like 18, 36</p>
<p>In the cliffnotes ap bio review book, the following things are listed as “evidence for evolution” :
- paleontology provides fossils that reveal the prehistoric existence of extinct species…
- biogeography
- embryology
- comparative anatomy
- molecular biology examines the nucleotide and amino acid sequences of DNA and proteins from different species…</p>
<p>so I think carbon dating is the answer</p>
<p>i think it was respiration. but either way, there are 36 atoms because there are 24 in glucose (6 carbons, 12 hydrogens, and 6 oxygens) and 12 in oxygen (there are 6 molecules of O2)</p>
<p>i can’t for the life of me remember the answer choices to that one, aquamarinee</p>
<p>i will ask my anthropology teacher tomorrow. he will know.</p>
<p>"So what was</p>
<p>Number of atoms in reaction (I think it was like photosynthesis or something?)
I remember some of the answers being like 18, 36"</p>
<p>No, that’s the haploid/diploid question right right? If a haploid cell has 18, diploid has 36. The number of atoms in the rxn was a different question.</p>
<p>Oh god, please let carbon dating be the answer. I can’t really afford to get anymore wrong.</p>
<p>Yeah, me neither. Getting any more wrong would just completely defeat the purpose of my re-take. I don’t exactly need anything below 750 right now…</p>
<p>I think the answer is carbon dating, simply because it cannot tell if two organisms are related…just because they came from the same time era doesn’t mean that they are related.</p>
<p>I know I have AT LEAST 5 wrong right now, and left 7 blank.</p>
<p>“I think the answer is carbon dating, simply because it cannot tell if two organisms are related…just because they came from the same time era doesn’t mean that they are related.”</p>
<p>same. carbon dating AND studying the fossil record would show relationships, but since fossil record was another choice, it makes it seem like you would merely be doing carbon dating…</p>
<p>well, fossil records can show the digression of two evolutionary paths from one single ancestor, and therefore it is not the answer.</p>
<p>it seems that only carbon dating cannot show the relationship between two organisms. Everything else works.</p>
<p>What did you put for the mitotic spindle one? I just want to make sure you guys got the same thing.</p>
<p>“pulls both ways” or something… you’re talking about the one where the scientist cuts it right before it pulls away, right?</p>
<p>Yup, that one.</p>
<p>I got the same thing. Good.</p>
<p>lol i got stupid and put “mitosis requires energy” or something</p>
<p>Scores are out on November 20th. Aaah… I hope the curve is the same as last time! =]</p>