<p>[Nation</a> & World | For status-conscious students, no free lunch | Seattle Times Newspaper](<a href=“http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2004252841_stigma01.html]Nation”>http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2004252841_stigma01.html)</p>
<p>*SAN FRANCISCO Although Francisco Velazquez, a 14-year-old freshman with spiky hair and sunglasses, qualifies for a free lunch at Balboa High School here, he was not eating. He scanned a table full of friends and asserted, “I’m not hungry.”</p>
<p>On another day, a group of classmates who also qualify for federally subsidized lunches sat on a bench. One ate a slice of pizza from the line where students pay for food; the rest went without.</p>
<p>Lunchtime “is the best time to impress your peers,” said Lewis Geist, a senior at Balboa and its student-body president. Being seen with a free or reduced-price meal, he said, “lowers your status.”*</p>
<p>When my daughter qualified for FRL, she still didn’t eat lunch in the cafeteria- not because in her case she was worried about status, but because the food was :p.
Greasy , heavy, laden with salt. Not very appealing especially for kids who have a hard time getting interested in food anyway.</p>
<p>Some schools in Seattle have separate lines for students on FRL, way to marginalize students guys!
We have more problems with the socio economic divide in the city schools- but the racial divide is what gets the money thrown at it.</p>
<p>The kids on FRL most need a good healthy tasty meal, but they are the least likely to be getting it.
If they are hungry, how can they learn?</p>