<p>In light of the diverse opinions expressed on the casual dress thread, I thought I’d try asking your opinion on another subject. ; ) Ive been asked for advice, but have been reluctant to give any; I’ll be pressed about it again soon.</p>
<p>Friend and her husband own a large house. They bought it (new) at the height of the housing bubble when elderly parents needed to move in with them, but the parents have since died and left a very small estate. The house for which they paid approx. $1.5MM now appraises at $1.3MM. The absorption rate for houses >$1MM in their general area is about 30 months (& would likely be higher if discouraged sellers returned their properties to the market.) Nothing in their neighborhood has sold for >$1MM in several years.</p>
<p>Friend and her husband have been quite frugal and just paid off their mortgage. Their RE taxes, utilities, HOA fees, HO ins., etc. average $1,500/mo. They estimate routine maintenance (from HVAC service to refreshing the mulch) runs about $300/mo. </p>
<p>Nice rentals are rare; a 3bd/2ba condo in a desirable area rents for about $3,500/mo. If they moved into a rental condo, their monthly expenses would probably total $4K/mo. including utilities, renters ins., and rent on a 2nd parking spot, or more than double their current routine monthly expenditures. </p>
<p>Their monthly outlay does not include savings for major repairs, appliance updating, etc., and they have a $5K co-pay on their HO ins., so theres a chance they could face some big out of pocket costs if they remain in the house. That unknown has Friend worried. Friends dh wants to remain in the house until he retires in ? years (hes not sure when), then try to sell it. He thinks it would be foolish to downsize so drastically for nearly double the monthly outlay. Friend is tired of taking care of the big house (& probably exhausted from caring for the elderly parents until recently.) </p>
<p>Both Friend and her dh are concerned about the absorption rate in their price range and think that even if they price the house below appraised value it may linger for a couple of years. It would be stressful to keep the house ready to show for so long. Shed be relieved to move on, even if that meant pricing the house at ¾ of its appraised value. I think her exhaustion is clouding her thinking, plus her feelings about the house may be affected by the sadness of the last few years. Friend also argues that were facing another recession and it will just get tougher for them to sell. My crystal ball broke back in the 80s, so I have no clue. Friend does recognize that they can no longer invest the proceeds in anything reasonably safe and get a return that will cover their rental expenses. She admits her reasons for selling are mostly based on emotion and fear of the unknown, but says life is too short for her to spend the next 5+ years maintaining a huge house. Hiring a cleaning service would help right now, but theres still the issue of needing to replace appliances, HVAC systems, etc. before they sell if they stay six years, and they may get even less for the house down the road. I happen to love their house (or more specifically, their lot & view) and think they should stay put until the husband retires. But Im not the one who may have to pay for a (huge) new roof or any other repairs. The husband’s commute time would be halved, but he says that’s not an issue for him. She may be hoping that between the shorter commute & lack of house chores they’d have more time to do something fun together.</p>
<p>Under these circumstances, would you remain in the house for another 5+ years, or would you try to sell now and move to a convenient and easy to maintain rental?</p>