Hello,
I got accepted into UCL earlier this year, with my condition being 38/45 and an aggregate score of 18 in my HL subjects (I take IB).
Today, my results came out, and I got 36/45 and an aggregate score of 17 in my HLs, which means I did not satisfy the conditions.
However, I am on the threshold of a higher grade boundary in two SL subjects - I am 2 marks away from a 6 in ESS and 1 mark away from a 7 in Maths.
If I submit these two for reevaluation and they work out, I will increase my score to 38/45 (satisfying the first condition), but I will still miss the condition that requires me to get 18 in my HL subjects. However, would they accept me regardless, given how I only missed the condition by 1 point, and still got 38/45?
Is it worth sending these two subjects for reevaluation? The IB refunds you your money if there is a change in grade, but the price is steep regardless. Ultimately, is it worth sending the transcripts for a long shot chance of UCL accepting me regardless?
(I must add here that I will be majoring in History, and as things stand, I will be attending King’s College London, which adds to my dilemma - is the drop-off between KCL History and UCL History so much that I should put myself through this process, which will be mentally straining, and may cost my family ~$200 if the reevaluations don’t work out?)
TL;DR: Missed my UCL offer (38/45 & 18 HL) by 2 points overall and 1 HL point; I’m 1–2 marks away from grade bumps that could push me to 38/45. Is it worth the cost and stress of reevaluation, especially since I have King’s for History as a backup?
Thank you so much for reading, and have a good day!