Significance of Study Abroad stats

<p>Many schools are proud that they have a high percentage of students studying abroad. I understand this perspective, especially when schools have a strong international focus. But it seems odd to me that few, if any, schools think a high study abroad rate could reflect poorly on them. A high study abroad rate could indicate engaged and aware students. But too high and I start to wonder WHY so many students want to spend time away from their college. The more kids away junior year, the lonelier/less-energetic the campus will be if you stay in the US.</p>

<p>So, what to you is an ideal range? I.e. high enough that study abroad is respected and feasible, but low enough that the campus isn’t drained of energy. How high a percent indicates student dissatisfaction with the school/feeling confined? Especially in a smaller school, what significance do you lend study abroad stats? And, finally, any idea why no college seems to consider that too high a percent could reflect poorly on them?</p>

<p>Personally I believe 100% would be an ideal rate. Study abroad is a vital part of a global educational experience and a real maturing experience.</p>

<p>This is one of those things that is so trendy now that there are many thing people don’t think to ask. A high percentage of students studying abroad doesn’t worry me but I really wonder what programs they are studying with. They are seldom programs that are run by the school that the student so carefully selected. Not to say that study abroad isn’t a potentially good thing (although I think I favor one semester over whole year), but people should examine the options more carefully and not necessarily just give a school credit for sending a high percentage of students abroad.</p>

<p>anyone else?</p>