<p>no they were talking about some logical fallacy</p>
<p>I respectfully request that we no longer bring up any more logical fallacies, unless someone is actually committing one while attempting to make an argument of meaningful significance. Thanks. :)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yes.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I believe that it’s called my PM inbox. :)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Hmm. Well, here are some common prepositions (from [here](<a href=“http://www.englishclub.com/grammar/prepositions-list.htm]here[/url]):”>Preposition List | Grammar | EnglishClub)):</a></p>
<p>•aboard
•about
•above
•across
•after
•against
•along
•amid
•among
•anti
•around
•as
•at
•before
•behind
•below
•beneath
•beside
•besides
•between
•beyond
•but
•by
•concerning
•considering
•despite
•down
•during
•except
•excepting
•excluding
•following
•for
•from
•in
•inside
•into
•like
•minus
•near
•of
•off
•on
•onto
•opposite
•outside
•over
•past
•per
•plus
•regarding
•round
•save
•since
•than
•through
•to
•toward
•towards
•under
•underneath
•unlike
•until
•up
•upon
•versus
•via
•with
•within
•without</p>
<p>These single-word prepositions can be used in phrases, called prepositional phrases. For example (the preposition itself is in italics; the “objects” of the prepositional phrase are basically everything else except the conjunctions and the articles):</p>
<p>below the ground</p>
<p>between the floor and the ceiling</p>
<p>with Bob and his sister</p>
<p>The objects of a prepositional phrase should be in the objective case. Sometimes, an error is committed when, instead, the subjective case of a pronoun is used (these sentences are incorrect for that reason):</p>
<p>below he</p>
<p>between you and I</p>
<p>with she and Sally</p>
<p>They can be corrected by switching to the objective case (the underlined words were changed):</p>
<p>below him</p>
<p>between you and me</p>
<p>with her and Sally</p>
<p>I hope that this clarifies.</p>
<p>Antonioray- I was just kidding with you, sir.
No need to get angry.</p>
<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/high-school-life/970189-challenge-kingsize.html#post1065335408[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/high-school-life/970189-challenge-kingsize.html#post1065335408</a></p>
<p>Antonioray, I say we squash the beef, and let the hood know that it is a war now.
Come to HSL.</p>
<p>3:54am Friday (CDT) - Time in Illinois, United States of America</p>
<p>Sleep well, silverturtle :)</p>
<p>Silverturtle, what happened? War? Debate? These are some confusing stuff in this post…</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Well, I answered someone’s question about admissions. Kingsize called my true statement a myth and went on to great lengths to demonstrate why it was a myth. He proved his intermediate arguments, but he was missing the point and never actually indicated any fallacious about my original statement. And then antonioray had a problem with my “perfectly fine” phrase because he is opposed to the formal use of an absolute modifier unless one really means it. I saw a potential justification for even the formal use of that, though, but I was not able to successfuly convey it. That’s basically what happened.</p>
<p>
I thought grammatically controversial questions, if any, were either thrown out of the SAT or not tested entirely. Hmm Hmm</p>
<p>^ The debate didn’t have anything to do with the SAT. Neither debate was meaningful.</p>
<p>I don’t really understand, then. Within the limitations of the SAT, your guide should be impeccable. Moreover, I don’t understand why the critics themselves make their own guides, if the critics feel discontent, and post their own interpretations in CC.</p>
<p>^ I suspect that antonioray was sincerely interested in discussing that grammatical issue, and kingsize was likely attempting to establish his interesting but probably feigned personality. :)</p>
<p>^^Benhpark: I am also working on my SAT Subject Tests Guide.
I was having a discussion with silverturtle about GPA and acceptance rates.</p>
<p>
Partly; courseload and SAT</p>
<p>
I beg to differ.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>That is not the debate that we were referring to.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>When? I don’t recall this.</p>
<p>I have no idea what kind of debate is or isn’t going on right now, but I have a question…
Based on your experience, did you find the PSAT to be a good predictor of SAT scores? Also, if you took them more than once, did your score rise from one year to the next?</p>
<p>^^^
</p>
<p>What do you mean? Are you writing an SAT Subject Tests study guide on top of your own SAT guide?</p>
<p>
Boogle has a 4.1 GPA… remember?</p>
<p>For me, no.
But I practiced more for the SAT and it brought back fruitful results.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Nope, I believe my mate silverturtle has done an excellent job of posting a thorough SAT study guide.</p>
<p>My specialties are the subject tests.
I took way more than a college requires, and I aced most of them (except for one) so I think my guide can be useful.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>They correlate very well on average, but there are many exceptions, especially for those who prepare effectively between the PSAT and SAT. Your scores on official SAT practice tests are better indicators.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>No, you are misremembering. I don’t recall ever discussing acceptance rates either.</p>