<p>
This is one of the main criticisms of 23AndMe. If I am remembering correctly, they do not have genetic counseling services available, but there are other companies who provide genetic counseling services for a fee, such as Pathway Genomics.</p>
<p>Honestly, the lack of genetic counseling services was not a big dealbreaker for me. I chose to have the genotyping done after participating in a few graduate courses in molecular and cellular biology, and felt my background in clinical research provided enough background to evaluate the results accurately. Yes, it was scary to open some of the info. (for especially sensitive tests, such as some of the BRCA mutations they test for, you are required to “unlock” the test results and can choose not to see them if you do not want to).</p>
<p>For what it’s worth, I’ve had my results about 6 months now, and I feel it has been an enjoyable experience for me, but I’m not convinced about clinical relevance of the results yet. There simply seems to be too much data (23AndMe provides access to download your raw data, which provides info. about ~1,000,000 SNPs) to make firm predictions and/or conclusions in most cases. I’ve found 23AndMe’s “risk predictions” to be overly simplistic in almost all cases – often narrowing down disease risk to results of just 1 or 2 SNPs, which seems unlikely, given complex nature of most diseases. Add into that the epigenetic effects affecting gene expression, and the overall clinical picture gets even cloudier.</p>
<p>For somebody like me, who’s been referred to 6 neurologists in 6 months, and still can’t seem to get a firm diagosis on mysterious neurological symptoms, the data seems to have been both a blessing and a curse. After abnormal brain MRIs led doctors initially to suspect MS, I spent a weekend trying to figure out if their preliminary diagnosis was correct based on my results for hundreds of different genetic variants (my genetic results appear to show I have lower risk compared to general population). Since I received that diagnosis via an online message on a Friday evening, it’s possible that even without genetic results I would have spent a weekend somewhat obsessively searching whether the diagnosis seemed to fit, but hard to say.</p>
<p>A few weeks later, after another doctor suggested it could be Wilson’s Disease instead, I was happy to be able to “check” my genetic results that night and identify a confirmed Wilson’s disease-causing variant (in ATP7B gene). But, clinical results did not match up with genetic results, so I am still searching for diagnosis (ironically, doctor’s have referred me now to specialist in sleep disorders based on another extremely rare genetic variant I had). If it does in fact turn out to be related to the sleep disorder, that will likely affect my feelings about genetic testing significantly. Prior to my mention of the variant, nobody suspected it (very, very rare in adults), but after awkwardly suggesting it, doctors have acted quickly to begin testing for that diagnosis. No doubt in my mind that it wouldn’t have been anywhere close to their radar for years, if not decades, had I not had the genetic results available to me. </p>
<p>Other interesting findings have related to CYP2D6 mutations (explaining many of the adverse effects I’ve experienced with certain drugs, despite being told they were likely psychosomatic / “all in my head” previously), salt-wasting disorders (providing a somewhat plausible explanation for my frequent hyponatremic episodes), ancestry findings, and more.</p>
<p>At this point, everything is still mostly just “interesting” to me, and not yet entirely useful, but I think that it’s beginning to change now, as genetic testing becomes more and more available (rate of development in sequencing technologies actually exceeds Moore’s Law now, iirc).</p>