<p>I’ve added my responses to the above posts after the “–>”</p>
<p>“In the business world, it is essential to network and learn to deal with clients who can either be nice or a *****. And SMU teaches you that, in the sense that they have special grooming and networking sessions for biz students and has such a competitive environment where you get to learn how to deal with self-centred and irresponsible teammates. Due to the heavier emphasis on projects and presentations in SMU than NUS/NTU, I’d say that dealing with freeriders is more prevalent in SMU.”</p>
<p>–> NUS and NTU business both have quite high projects/presentations component too. Same for all the special grooming and networking sessions. I don’t see how this is any different.</p>
<p>“Due to the class participation points which constitute a higher weightage in SMU than NUS/NTU, it is VERY common to see all your classmates fighting to have their views heard. Some can be constructive ones while some are not. But at least it broadens your perspectives. Furthermore, shy and reserved students will find it a good opportunity to force themselves out of their comfort zones.”</p>
<p>–> NUS and NTU have both adopted seminar-style teaching too. Again, the difference is not as much as you imagine.</p>
<p>“Community involvement programmes (CIP) are part of SMU’s graduation requirements and they are a good and enriching experience for students to learn the importance of giving back to society. On the other hand, I don’t think NUS/NTU has that part of their graduation requirements, and hence, students find no incentive to give back to society but just mug for the honours.”</p>
<p>–> I don’t understand why students need an “incentive” to give back to society. Many NUS/NTU students, even those outside of the business school, are involved in many community projects. I think the fact that it isn’t a graduation requirement for NUS/NTU students, employers tend to view the efforts from NUS/NTU as more genuine. </p>
<p>“For the fact - SMU has just been recently accredited by AACSB (and I guess this is something that people dont expect coming from a school that only performs for short time) and it also has partnership with CFA. We are on the way to gain EQUIS accreditation.”</p>
<p>–> Personally, I don’t put too much weight on accreditation. There are many good schools overseas which don’t bother applying for accreditation. Similarly, there are many schools which aren’t that great, but have received accreditation too.</p>
<p>“SMU has been highly favoured by employers in Singapore, and what I mean is that though we are young, big company like Goldman Sach, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Barclays, Blackrock, Citibank, etc have been recruiting SMU students.”</p>
<p>–> These companies hire from NUS/NTU too and I don’t see SMU students being specifically “favoured”.</p>
<p>My final thoughts - Personally, I think SMU is a pretty good school. It is a pity that SMU students seem to be very insecure with regards to their school’s reputation and often go around attacking NUS/NTU with the aim of pulling up their school’s reputation. As a business school, I think that’s a pretty low tactic. Shouldn’t you be able to promote the school solely on the basis of its strengths?</p>
<p>** Disclaimer: I am not from NUS/NTU business but I know many students who have graduated from these two schools (and also SMU) and I am rather familiar with their curriculum.</p>