Specific method approaches in the acting colleges?

<p>^ True dat. Plus you have to understand that Stanislavski’s system was created as a compliment to the presentational styles prevalent in his day. Not as a total replacement like the old Group Theater teachers who misunderstood it and essentially threw the baby out with the bathwater would have had it. We’re really just now getting past all that and it’s one area in which academia is typically lagging a bit behind although most of the good schools now address at least some of it in physical theatre classes. Most commonly Suzuki, Viewpoints, Lecoq, Grotwoski, Laban, Malgrem and Meyerhold. Not to mention Chekhov who actually was connected directly to Stanislavski although with a great deal of divergence. And then you have some other modern approaches to just playing psychological realism which is the goal of Stanislavski’s system like Harold Guskin’s which is very much divorced from it as well as Charles Conrad’s [“Choiceless</a> Awareness.”](<a href=“http://www.backstage.com/advice-for-actors/acting-teachers/something-to-not-think-about]"Choiceless”>http://www.backstage.com/advice-for-actors/acting-teachers/something-to-not-think-about)</p>

<p>Now just for fun’s sake since I can’t help myself, here’s a blurb from one of the top LA “finishing” teachers whose approach is similar to Harold Guskin’ s although it’s geared primarily for tv and film work … </p>

<p>

:slight_smile:
But before any kids get any rebellious ideas about what you’ll learn in college, she expects her new students to already have some kind of Stanislavski based training before you go to her. Hell, she has a BFA from Tisch, an MFA from Yale and basically put the Marymount Manhattan BFA on the map during her time teaching there.</p>