Stanford results usually consistent with HYP?

[Omega_Sanction]

<p>

It’s large in the context of only the cross-admits. But I’m talking about cross-admits as a fraction of total student body. If the admissions processes were very similar, you would expect a high percentage of cross-admits. One hundred students is relatively insignificant in that context.

</p>

<p>You’re underestimating the number and I’m overestimating it. Your underestimation comes from the fact that not that we don’t know how many people even applied to more than one of these schools. My flaw is as you’ve pointed out, it is somewhat insignificant in the larger scope of things.</p>

<p>

It’s not that females have less competition and thus get in at higher rates, but that females in general tend to be more qualified and thus get in at higher rates. Self-selection at work.

</p>

<p>I agree with this assertion to an extent, but do you have an explanation as to why females are grossly underrepresented in competitions with known gender-neutral selection processes such math, physics, chemistry, etc. Olympiads?</p>