<p>If you knew this park was a place where people (men) meet to have sex, would you take your little kids there?</p>
<p>If I knew " how" because I read about it on the internet, or because every single time I went there, I saw sexual activity on the trail?</p>
<p>Those things are not something I look for or worry about.
What I would think about is safety, is it a well made trail, am I likely to have to take a detour where I would get lost, go off a cliff? Is it too steep/long for the kids?
Is my car going to get broken into when it is parked? Am I going to be assaulted/robbed on the trail?
Worrying about seeing somebody’s butt, accidentally, isn’t a concern as long as it isn’t a place that attracts exhibitionists for some weird reason.</p>
<p>I do because when I was walking down the street at age 10, a man pulled over, rolled down his window and orgasmed in front of me. It was traumatic for me. If I knew that we might encounter something similar at a park <em>known</em> for such activity, I would keep my kids far, far away.</p>
If I knew they met to make arrangements to have sex elsewhere, I’d go. If they were actually having sex in the park where I could encounter them, probably not. I wouldn’t want to encounter anyone having sex in public.</p>
<p>If a park becomes dominated, or even significantly impacted, by illegal activity, you may not want to go there. This could be sex, drugs, or even nudity.</p>
<p>But there may be legal activity that might also make you want to avoid certain parks–smoking, or a lot of dogs, or it may become a favorite gathering place for creepy biker gangs, or teenagers.</p>
<p>What the OP is talking about is something that is uncomfortably on the border between the two. If you say you want to avoid a park frequented by gay men, you sound intolerant, while if you say you want to avoid a park frequented by gay men who have sex in the bushes there, it’s a different story.</p>
<p>Surely you can see that the way you phrased your original post was hardly likely to result in an outpouring of support? Had you asked any of us if we wanted to stumble over people (of any orientation) having sex in public, you’d almost certainly have had a unanimous “no.” You asked if we thought “solo males” should be reported for … being in a state park. One that you learned on the internet (always an unimpeachable source of information :rolleyes:) has been used as a “gay ■■■■■■■■ place.” </p>
<p>If you had phrased your OP more judiciously, perhaps our “self-righteousness” wouldn’t have offended you so.</p>
<p>The main reason I go hiking is to relax. To get away from anything stressful. </p>
<p>So I would stay away from a park that had a reputation for gay sex in the bushes, or prostitution, drug exchanges, etc. Seeing that would add that element of stress, embarrassment, or with the drugs and prostitutes even danger, that I just don’t want on a park visit. </p>
<p>And to the guy who goes to Sequoia National Park, there are certain areas there that are dangerous because of marijuana farming operations run by drug cartels. </p>
<p>There are no go areas in parks along the Mexican-California border because of the dangers from human and drug smuggling. </p>
<p>Just seeing men alone on the trail wouldn’t bother me. As long as they were taking their hook-ups elsewhere for the sex.</p>
<p>Be made aware?? By whom? Posted signs? Gossip? Rumors? And who saw anybody having sex in your park? You didn’t. You saw men hiking alone. And they saw you. What were you up to?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>If I KNEW gay men were having sex in a park in broad daylight in places that were viewable from the playground or picnic table or trail then no, I wouldn’t take my kids. But if I had heard unsubstantiated rumors from some homophobes, I still might go.</p>
<p>State Park sex made it on the following list of 102 places to have sex on the Romance Struck website. So, I agree with OP that this is not an issue only to the homophobic.</p>
<p>To be extra careful, everyone needs to (1) avoid these places and/or (2) request that the authorities provide additional patrols.</p>
<p>Our family regularly hikes in a beautiful local state park. I occasionally notice men walking the trails alone who give me creeps, so I never hike alone there or allow my kids to. These men are not dressed for hiking on dirt trails - they are wearing sandals or street shoes and non-hiking attire, and seem not to be moving in hiking mode. I know their attire is not necessarily indicative of anything, but nature gave us our intuition for a reason, and my antennae go up when I see them. It actually never occurred to me that they might be gay, I was more fearful for my Ds hiking alone there. Now I won’t let my S go alone, either!</p>
<p>What if we just closed all state parks to everybody except married, monogamous, heterosexual couples when both spouses are present? That way perhaps we could be less frightened while hiking.</p>
<p>Or, pass a law that requires all people to tattoo their sexual persuasion on their forehead to assist us in knowing why and for whom to be scared if a person is seen unaccompanied in a state park.</p>
<p>Aside. Have you ever noticed that lots of women hikers have short hair and not a lot, if any, makeup on? Hum.</p>
<p>It must be fun to make light of the situation when you are a man, 07DAD. Recently here in CA, a teenage girl was assaulted and murdered by a lone man while running on park trails.</p>
<p>It was actually my H who first mentioned that he thought something was up (no pun intended.) I didn’t even think anything when we passed the first guy on the path. He was wearing purple satin drawstring pants, no top, had pierced nipples and streaked blond hair. I just thought–“Not something I’d wear to go hiking.” </p>
<p>My H believes he did see sexual activity. I did not.</p>
<p>Obviously you cannot believe everything you read on the internet, (I don’t believe half of what I read here), but one of the sites described the place and pretty much the behavior we witnessed,i.e. which paths to take, etc. This is not a groomed downtown park. It’s a few hundred acres of mostly woods, a few streams, some crude paths in the middle of no where.</p>
<p>Oh and 07DAD–do you give your kids front and center seats when you are doing your thing at each of those 102 places? You sound like a busy man.</p>
<p>So the bottom line is I wrote on here what I saw–which was men. Not all women or all teens. Then I wrote what I found written about the park. With what I saw and read, if my kids were still young, I wouldn’t take them there. I don’t know if I’ll go back. I wouldn’t drop dead if I saw people having sex. But I don’t particularly want to see it. But I don’t view pornography either. </p>
<p>It was my H who said to me, “Lets get out of here.” I do not think he wants to go back. He doesn’t care if someone is gay either. I just don’t think he is into pierced nipples.</p>
<p>I do know people with children who would definitely want to be warned about the place.</p>
<p>Running is pairs with a male has nothing to do some how with warning people that gay or heterosexual ■■■■■■■■ occurs or necessarily with having extra patrols. While not every time, often these attacks are random and rape is a crime of violence (as is murder), not sex.</p>
<p>A few years ago, I took a walk on a trail near our then home with our dog. In the middle of the “park”, I encountered a bunch of kids/young men with pitbulls. They looked like a scruffy lot using bad language and looking threatening (in my opinion). They stopped talking and watched me intently as I went by, very nervously. </p>
<p>Since then, I am careful about walking on trails and anywhere that I don’t research first. If you don’t know, yes, it can be unsafe. And a gay meeting place is not on my list of places to avoid. I’m talking gang meeting places, drug deals spots, etc. where you are truly putting your life at risk going by at the wrong time. This is not limited to parks. You don’t walk in strange neighborhoods alone, either without having some idea where you are going. Not if you have any safety sense.</p>