<p>
Very good point! In the recent article that Soozie cited, it said that Huguely’s not reporting the Lexington arrest himself was a violation of the Code of Conduct. I wonder if he reported his other problems with the law?</p>
<p>This article is interesting, but even more interesting are some of the comments:</p>
<p>[University</a> of Virginia leaders to meet with McDonnell | Richmond Times-Dispatch](<a href=“http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/state_regional/article/UVAA06S11_20100505-234002/342538/]University”>http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/state_regional/article/UVAA06S11_20100505-234002/342538/)</p>
<p>"Currently, some police departments call the university as a courtesy, but it is not mandatory.</p>
<p>‘Strikes me as odd,’ Casteen said, ‘that the law does not require that kind of notification.’"</p>
<p>Here are some comments beneath the article that address Casteen’s statement. I think these commenters make really good points!</p>
<p>"Criminal records are protected by Federal laws. Once the person turns 18, there is no right of anyone to know anything. </p>
<p>Where would you stop? Will this include a requirement to report EVERY arrest of every student? In any type of institution? No matter where the student lived? What about all the
technical schools that are ACCREDITED by the same accreditation groups as the bigger schools? What about a student who takes one class at a time at VCU or UVA? What about a 45 year old guy taking a couple classes at Bluefield or ECPI? This wont work. UVA need to change THEIR rules and REQUIRE students that are arrested to report it to the University. Make it an honor code violation not to notify the university if you are arrested, or if you know of someone else who has been arrested and have not disclosed it. </p>
<p>This is not the job of law enforcement, even if you could get the laws changed regarding the release of criminal information."</p>
<p>And this one:</p>
<p>“What strikes me as odd is that the universities dont feel the same need to inform parents of behaviorial incidents involving their children on campus (or the kids grades) given the fact that parents are the primary source of funding for those tuition bills.<br>
As any university administrator will tell you, those students are, in most cases, adults in the eyes of the law, having reached the age of majority and are entitled to privacy. Both the victim and the perpetrator in these case were 22, well into their adult years.
The Lexington Police had no way of knowing that Hugueley was a UVA student, and the incident, while it may have been an indicator of future trouble, did not involve the university in any way and was none of the universitys business. While higher ed traditionally considered itself in loco parentis, that view has changed over the years. Casteen and the other school presidents need to decide; they cant have it both ways.”</p>