Well, that’s the lore here but is it based on actual substance?
Nor do I think it is as much as an arms race as folks on CC like to think, especially with LACs who are more holisitic in their their admissions. Every cycle we see results which prove that test scores often aren’t the driving factor. I think too much value is given to test scores because they are easily quantifiable. If Davidson wanted subject tests, they’d require them or “recommend” them. If an applicant has taken subject tests and they are strong, sure send them in. It’s not like winning brownie points for taking the most tests. If you think it is, then how many do you suggest kids take - 3, 4, 5…? Might as well go for more if it is viewed to be that important.