Suggestions on destroying earth

<p>Alright, I’ve looked through [Top</a> 10 Ways to Destroy Earth | LiveScience](<a href=“http://www.livescience.com/technology/destroy_earth_mp-1.html]Top”>Top 10 Ways to Destroy Earth | Live Science) and it seems most of them cannot be accomplished during my lifetime; however #6 and #2 apparently can. However, I would like to look at a bunch of different suggestions to complete as fast as possible with the highest possible probability that it would actually get through. Please post links, your own theories, etc. Also, don’t forget, the more the better, so if you’re in on this send me a PM and I’ll tell you what to do next. I’m posting this from a web cafe so my identity isn’t compromised. I recommend you spread this message on other forums, billboards, ads, etc. with complete anonymity as well. Thanks and good luck!</p>

<p>Do you want to physically destroy the Earth or just kill everyone on it?</p>

<p>why man why?</p>

<p>put Osama whoops I meant Obama in charge of it</p>

<p>^^^^^
yeah, since his term ends around Dec 2012, he will have screwed up so much it will have obliterated all of mankind just like the Mayans had predicted. :P</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>“Do you want to physically destroy the Earth …”
Currently, yes.</p>

<p>“… or just kill everyone on it?”
That would also be sufficient for my purposes, but it seems at the moment that the method that would have the highest guarantee of total extinction of humanity would be destruction of the Earth. I have thought about just using a lot of h-nukes, among other methods, but realized that there would be a higher probability of remaining humans after execution of the plan.</p>

<p>TESTOSTERONE: The Spice of Life</p>

<p>If only we all lived on Jupiter. There’d be plenty of room (for us to die in a matter of seconds).</p>

<p>I would like to clarify what I said previously and in the process make an introduction for our group, currently consisting of 10 highly-trained professionals.</p>

<p>The ultimate goal of our group is the destruction of humanity. It is in our belief that the ultimate meaning of existence involves destruction of what existed, and that humans, which exist like any other atom, must also be destroyed. But this doesn’t mean just waiting until Nature does it for us. We can’t be couch potatoes about this. The meaning of life is not only to destroy what existed, but to do so as fast as possible. It’s too bad most people are blind to this – that’s why we’re here.</p>

<p>It seems at the moment that the method that would have the highest guarantee of total extinction of humanity would be destruction of the Earth. As I said previously, we have thought about other methods that didn’t involve destroying earth, such as using a lot of h-nukes, but realized that there would be a higher probability of remaining humans after execution of the plan. Furthermore, destruction of the earth would be like hitting two birds with one stone, in light of the meaning of life.</p>

<p>So, to put it succinctly: although the ultimate goal of our group is to destroy humanity, one possible method of achieving this is by destroying Earth, and given that the meaning of existence is the destruction of what existed as fast as possible, achieving our ultimate goal using the aforementioned method will mark off two entities from the Checklist.</p>

<p>Your flowery words contradict your meaning. “Entities” doesn’t really fit.</p>

<p>And your sole purpose in life is a little scary.</p>

<p>Put ol’ George Bush back in the Oval Office. He came damn near to running it all into the ground once. Who knows what would’ve happened if he’d had a couple of more years.</p>

<p>But wait, wouldn’t destroying the Earth now mean that you wouldn’t have a base to destroy the rest of the universe from? How about holding the Earth hostage, and then enslaving everyone to help you destroy all 10^80 particles in the observable universe.</p>

<p>10^80 sounds so small when you think of it that way.</p>

<p>And then, we actually don’t know if there are other universes as well.</p>

<p>1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
is a lot. It’s really doesn’t seem like it though. However, you are right in that our cosmology has much to learn, and it a larger universe/multiverses/both/neither, is entirely possible.</p>

<p>HADR10 - did you really count exactly 80 zeroes >_<</p>

<p>For me, I would just start a bunch of rumors leading to the destruction of the planet and let hysteria to take it out. After all the thing most people are afraid of is each other.</p>

<p>a simple way to destroy the earth:</p>

<p>if you ever get a weapon of mass destruction that will wipe out all of humanity, just make sure you DON’T use it. :)</p>

<p>I love this thread.</p>

<p>

I laughed so hard it’s not even funny.</p>

<p>I know, that cracked me up.</p>

<p>Don’t do it!:(</p>

<p>hmmm…make lots and lots of nanobots, probably at least a hundred, and program them to find humans and to zap them with lasers when they do.</p>

<p>I have the best way to do this:</p>

<p>simply spread the gospel of truth like you have here. Teach everyone about the importance if self-destruction… with the help of everyone in the world I’m sure we can destroy most of the Earth ;)</p>