<p>JEM. thank you for posting that; it helps me a great deal to be able to see positive news, even if it isn’t my particular cancer. </p>
<p>I went to see my Miami oncologist this morning; I took to him the CDs of the PET/CT scans I had done in Washington two days ago, and then they also faxed him the report. I could not really understand the report by myself as it contains entirely too many medical terms, but, he said it was good news; after just two chemo cycles, the primary site is in agony and dying (his words - it’s dying from the inside and collapsing), and the metastasis site (liver) is either (1) gone, or (2) it was never cancer in the first place. I would have loved to have bought option (2), but, I reminded him the biopsy was done from the liver, so, it doesn’t really work to try to hope it was never really cancer in the first place. He then remembered, and agreed. </p>
<p>So I will have chemo next week, and, over Thanksgiving, and then, another scan, and then, chemo and radiation combined. </p>
<p>But back to the point of your post, JEM, I expressed to him that I knew the reality of this - that small cell lung cancer is highly sensitive to chemos and easy to kill and therefore this morning’s news - while very good and I am appreciative of even the smallest bit of good news - is not surprising; furthermore, that even if he manages to disappear all of it, 95% of all patients have a recurrance; that the second line of chemo is effective in only 20% of patients, and that there is no third line - then it’s scrambling for trials, etc.; I told him, basically, reading information online, studying carefully what medical professionals have written about this, the prognosis is either (1) die miserably and expensively {there is even an article online that I was NOT looking for but bumped into this morning that says that the cost to keep me alive for just one year is $2 million dollars} or (2) die faster. Then I asked him, did he know of anyone who did not have a recurrance? or who won this? Or who was able to reclaim their life? He said that he did. I asked, why, then, did I never read anything about long term survivors online or even just success stories, no matter how much research I do? </p>
<p>He said that it’s because the details and the facts are all in patient case files, and, doctors don’t publish case files - they’re big bulky things that doctors don’t dump out onto the internet. He said it becomes known that this is winnable because news travels as oncologists talk to each other. </p>
<p>I welcome and appreciate positive news; thank you again for posting that.</p>