Syllabus

Hi, im having trouble figuring out how to understand the syllabus. Can someone help me figure this out? Thanks in advance.
Here is a copy of one of my class syllabus…

Aug 31-Sept 4, Sept 7-11

Introductory—Engaging topics / Introduce aims and forms of discourse and academic writing / Critical reading and contextual analysis / Critical perspective and argument

Essay development and the writing process

LSH 2-36: “Writing Contexts” / “Academic Contexts” / “Writing Processes” / “Developing Paragraphs” / “Designing What You Write”

LSH 43-78: “Arguments” / “Rhetorical Analyses” / “Reports” / “Personal Narratives” / “Literary Analyses” / “Annotated Bibliographies” / “Abstracts” / “Reading Strategies”

Critical Reading and Contextual Analysis

BCNM 33-39: Plato–“Allegory of the Cave”

BCNM 628-34: Mortimer J. Adler–“How to Mark a Book”

BCNM 635-642: Frederick Douglass–“Learning to Read”

BCNM 40-53: Neil Postman, Steve Powers—“The Bias of Language, The Bias of Pictures”

BCNM 54-65: Mokoto Rich–“Literacy Debate: Online, R U Reading?”

To Issue: James W. Loewen—from Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong

To Issue: Tom Wolfe—“Pornoviolence”

To issue: James Madison—“The Most Dreaded Enemy of Liberty”

To issue: Gore Vidal—“We Are the Patriots”

To issue: Martin Luther King, Jr.—“Beyond Vietnam”

To issue: Helen Keller—“Strike Against War”

To issue: Smedley D. Butler—from War is a Racket

To issue: Kevin Tillman—selections

Sept 14-18

Critical reading and contextual analysis / Critical perspective and argument

BCNM 196-210: Eric Schlosser–“Why McDonald’s French Fries Taste So Good”

BCNM 256-71: William Lutz–“The World of Doublespeak”

BCNM 272-87: George Orwell–“Politics and the English Language”

(All assigned texts to date considered in juxtaposition with this week’s assigned texts)

Take-Home Essay Exam—using examples, integrating sources

Overview of Research Process: planning, selection and limitation of topic, research strategy and working bibliography, finding and using sources evaluating and synthesizing sources, note-taking—summary, paraphrase, and direct quotation—and avoiding plagiarism, source integration and documentation, thesis development, structure and composition

LSH 80-108: “Doing Research” / “Evaluating Sources” / “Synthesizing Ideas” / “Integrating Sources, Avoiding Plagiarism”

Assign Paper # 1: Analysis (1000 words)

Sept 21-25

Analysis

Discuss Analysis (paper # 1)—engaging ideas

BCNM 23-32: Elisabeth Kübler-Ross–“On the Fear of Death”

BCNM 698-708: Jessica Mitford–“Behind the Formaldehyde Curtain”

To issue: Gore Vidal—“Drugs”

Invention workshop

Working draft of paper # 1, with notes and sources.

Sept 28-Oct 2

Analysis / Synthesis

Submit research topic and planning proposals

BCNM 66-77: Paul Chaat Smith—"The Big Movie (from Everything You Know About Indians Is Wrong)

To Issue: Neil Postman—“Future Schlock”

Invention / revision and editing workshop

Working draft of paper # 1, with notes and sources.

Oct 5-9

Definition

Analysis Due Friday 10/9

BCNM 362-67: Margaret Atwood—“The Female Body”

BCNM 359-61: Sojourner Truth—“Ar’n’t I a Woman”

BCNM 12-22: Stephen Jay Gould—“Sex, Drugs, Disasters, and the Extinction of Dinosaurs”

BCNM 709-14: Samuel H. Scudder—“Look at Your Fish: In the Laboratory with Agassiz"

To issue: Benjamin R. Barber—“America Skips School”

Assign Paper # 2: Definition (1000-1500 words)

Oct 12-16

Definition

To issue: Jeremy Rifkin—“The Efficient Society”

Invention workshop

Working draft of paper # 2, with notes and sources.

Oct 19-23

Definition / Argument and Persuasion

To issue: Stanley Milgram—“The Perils of Obedience”

To issue: Hannah Arendt—“Denmark and the Jews”

Revision and editing workshop

Working draft of paper # 2, with notes and sources.

Oct 26-30

Argument and Persuasion

Definition Due Friday 10/30

Argument and Persuasion / Logic and Fallacies / Topic and Thesis

To Issue: George Orwell—“Shooting an Elephant”

Assign Paper # 3: Argumentative Research Paper (2000 words)

Nov 2-6

Argument and Persuasion

BCNM 99-109: Jonathan Swift—“A Modest Proposal"

Research, invention workshop

Working draft of paper # 3, with notes and sources.

Nov 9-13

Argument and Persuasion

To issue: Henry David Thoreau—“On Civil Disobedience”

Research, revision, and editing workshop

Working draft of paper # 3, with notes and sources.

Nov 16-20 (*11/20–Last day To drop w/Q)

Argument and Persuasion

To issue: Martin Luther King, Jr.—“Letter from Birmingham Jail”

Research, revision, and editing workshop

Working draft of paper # 3, with notes and sources.

Nov 23-24 (11/25-27–Holidays)

Comparative-Contexual Critique

Paper # 3 (Argumentative Research Paper) due Tuesday 24 November

BCNM 159-73: Terrell F. Dixon, Lisa Slappey—“The Bayou and the Ship Channel: Finding Place and Building Community in Houston, Texas”

BCNM 622-27: Audrey Wick—“The Siren Call of the Bingo Hall”

BCNM 525-28: Rachel Carson—“A Fable for Tomorrow”

BCNM 568-72: Maya Angelou—“Champion of the World”

BCNM 174-88: Maxine Hong Kingston—“No Name Woman”

BCNM 324-28: Sandra Cisneros—“Only Daughter”

BCNM 329-37: Judith Ortiz Cofer—“The Myth of the Latin Woman: I Just Met a Girl

Named Maria”

Nov 30-Dec 4

Comparative-Contextual Critique

To issue: Henry David Thoreau—“The Battle of the Ants”

To issue: Hwang Sunwon—“Cranes”

To issue: Khalida Asghar—“The Wagon”

To issue: Maggie Helwig—“Hunger”

To issue: K. C. Cole—“The Arrow of Time”

To issue: Loren Eiseley—“The Star Thrower”

Dec 7-11

Comparative-Contextual Critique

Discuss two assigned primary readings for Final Essay Exam (Contextual-Comparative Critique—1000 words).

Monday, Dec 14

Final Exam—12:45 PM-3:00 PM

It’s hard to look at a typed-out syllabus like this and explain it. What don’t you understand?

okay so where it says “Aug 31-Sept 4, Sept 7-11” then a bunch of other stuff. Before that it says all readings have to be completed before class starts. So am i supposed to read all that stuff? My other classes have day to day schedules so this one is confusing

I haven’t looked through this syllabus specifically because it’s hard to read and explain in this format. In my experience though, when a professor says to do readings before class starts they mean to finish the reading before the class on the indicated date. So let’s say a reading is listed under September 21. You’d be expected to have finished the indicated reading before the class meeting on the 21st.

If you’re still unsure, ask the professor for clarification.

Looks like that’s a weekly schedule type syllabus. Your professor should tell you what the reading is for the next class. That looks like it lists the reading for the entire week.

Yes, if the professor says to do the reading before the class, then you are supposed to read it all.

Sometimes, professors list readings for the entire week, rather than day by day, because they might be discussing those readings throughout the week, rather than half one day and half another day. Sometimes, they do it because it’s just more convenient than listing it out day by day. Sometimes, they do it to give themselves some flexibility in what they can discuss on each particular day, rather than tying them down to only being able to touch on a couple of readings.

If you are having trouble understanding what is expected of you, ask the professor. If you are not comfortable asking the professor, is there a TA you could ask? Another student in the class? You could even just ask the student sitting next to you, “Hey, do you know when we’re supposed to have XYZ read by?” or “Do you know what the reading is for the next class?”