I appreciate your courteous tone. And I want to reply in the same way. I disagree, strongly, with your post, but hope that the tone will read as polite disagreement.
There is NO legal requirement that two classes of the same subject be taught the same way. None. It’s close to impossible to teach them the same way. No two classes are going to have the same level of understanding. No two classes will have the same questions, or the same behavior. Very frequently, particularly in a winter like the one we’re just finishing, two classes will have different assignments because of different amounts of class time. (So, for example, if the OP’s school is on block scheduling, the MWF classes could have had significantly more/less class time this winter than the TTH classes, because of snow days and/or delayed openings. They could have had different numbers of tests/ quizzes for the same reason.)
In fact, the kind of scripted teaching you’re suggesting, where every single class receives the exact same lesson, is something that good teachers across the country are fighting tooth and nail. Because if every class must be the same, than that “same” is the least common denominator. It’s “teaching” at its worst.
As far as having an assignment when a kid is out of the room for “school purposes”-- that’s close to impossible as well. I’m sure you have no idea how often some kid in one of my classes is out for a school related activity, but it’s FREQUENT. And I teach 5 classes. So by that reasoning, I would have far, far, far fewer grades at report card time. We would spend a lot of time hanging around, waiting for the kids to return to school from the million different things that pull them from class.
Could someone cite me some of those educational laws I keep reading about? Because, honestly, this is the first I’ve heard of any of them.
“Hate crime”?? Really? What crime? No laws were broken. And “Hate”??? On whose part???
“Discrimination”??? Reacting is not the same thing as discriminating. Reacting is when someone’s actions-- in this case, the OP’s-- bring consequences. Discrimination means “the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people or things, especially on the grounds of race, age, or sex…” No one was discriminated against. You seem to be implying that any sort of consequence at all is a violation of Federal Civil Rights laws. The OP is not a “category” of people. The teacher reacted to the OP’s behavior. I’m sorry the reaction was unpleasant for the OP. But I’m guessing that the teacher went home, and told her husband all about he way some — I’ll skip the adjectives-- kid spoke to her. I’m guessing this was a day she’ll remember for some time to come, and not fondly.
“Rubber room”??? Do you know what that means?? You’re willing to risk the teacher’s career (and spend mega tax money, while you’re at it) because the OP was unhappy with the grade he/she received on an assignment that was carelessly done in a college level course.
You know, it’s funny. No where in the first post do I see any reference to learning, only to grades.