I am curious why @Dean J and others consider this a piece of “tabloid” journalism. Is it the penultimate paragraph? or the one preceeding it?
Because, other than that, the entire article (95%?) is literally just a compendium of facts about recent cases that put UVA in the news. There are no opinions about the incidents. It is literally one undeniable fact after another.
The only opinion is really her summary and you also have to realize that this is an opinion piece and is labelled as such. It is not a news article.