The College Admissions Process Is Broken

"Colleges should work together to make applications more manageable for students … Colleges know about these trends but have done too little to standardize their process and make it more accessible. Things are a bit easier thanks to “The Common Application,” a standardized electronic application accepted by over 600 colleges and universities. But too many schools don’t accept it, including the entire University of California system and the University of Texas system.

Even those that do often have additional requirements. Stanford University, for example, requires three different essay answers, along with multiple short answer responses that are completely different from those required by say, The University of Pennsylvania. Some colleges require two recommendations and SAT subject tests, while others do not." …

Opinion.

https://www.usnews.com/opinion/knowledge-bank/articles/2017-06-19/the-college-application-process-works-for-no-one

Pshaw. It is far easier today to apply to college than it’s ever been.

When I applied to college in the 80’s:
Our primary resources were a couple of college guides which each had a page or two of information on each school. My husband, an international student, had to use a 10 year old Petersen’s because that’s all his school library had. There was no way to hop onto Amazon and order a new one. Now students have page after page of information readily available on the internet.

If we wanted information on a particular school we had to look up the address, write a letter or make a phone call and wait for the week or two it took for a brochure or catalogue to show up in our mailboxes. Now students get on the internet to get all the information they need.

There was no Common App. Every school had their own application and each was different. Most had supplementary essays. Now most schools are on the CA and few have more than one extra essay. Even those that aren’t on the CA tend to use the same questions. You can apply to the entire UC system by filling out one application then checking boxes for which schools you want it to go to.

We had to do everything by hand or typewriter. Remember using white-out to clean up the typos on your app and how long it took to line everything up perfectly on the page? Now you write, rewrite and edit everything in one place then cut and paste it onto the CA.

Every school had an application fee, most close to the same fee being charged by schools today. Getting a fee waiver involved having your counselor phone the admissions office or writing a letter yourself. It was much less common and many schools didn’t give them. Now not only is the fact that schools give fee waivers widely available information but the process is much easier, and some schools have dropped the application fee altogether.

There was no College Confidential. What anecdotal or inside information you could get was based solely on who you knew. Now anyone can get on the internet and type in “Secret societies Yale” or “Safety statistics U Michigan” and get a dozen hits.

Teachers and counselors had to type up each letter separately to customize the name of the college or you would end up with a generic xeroxed letter. Asking a teacher to write recs. was a bigger deal and the more colleges you applied to the harder it was. Each letter had to go out in a sealed envelope signed along the back. Adding an extra school at the last minute was much more difficult if for this reason alone. Now a new school can be added by checking off an extra box and letters can be customized with a quick “search and replace.”

There were few, if any, outreach programs to minority and first generation students. Now they’re common and widely advertised.

There was no Common Data Set or Naviance. Now students have better, more accurate information about their chances at schools than ever before.

The fact that students have gotten hypercompetitive about applications and are in some cases applying to an insane number of schools is not the fault of the colleges. I would in fact argue that the current ease of application would make some small barriers to entry advisable. Many college have found that when they dropped the supplementary essay their application numbers increased but their yield dropped proportionally. There’s no reason for students to be applying to dozens of schools, particularly in cases where the student doesn’t need substantial FA.

Many kids, schools and families seem to want to be able to brag about how many schools the student got into. The girl who was accepted to 149 schools is a case in point. Just insane. It’s easier than ever to carefully craft a thoughtful list with a mix of reaches, matches and likelies with information easily found on the internet.

I do sympathize with the fact that everyone gets angsty about college these day and that acceptance rates have fallen, making what used to be match schools reaches and likelies matches. That doesn’t mean the process in general hasn’t gotten easier.

I think the application process works just dandy for Common App and all the colleges that send millions of dollars worth of literature to students in the hopes they will apply.

My son only applied to one common app school and we both thought it was a little bit of a pia.

Otherwise I think apps are fairly simple compared to previous days.

Common app is a life saver. We were able to add a school late in the process in an hour plus sending transcripts, etc.

If selective schools, don’t have supplements, the process would be even more random among top applicants. And making it easier, would mean even more applications per student when it is already insane that some are applying to 10-15 schools.

EDIT: I do agree about state schools taking common app. The school we added was a state school that did. Our primary safety was a state school that didn’t and that had a painful app for a school that was driven by numbers.

UC and UT have their own applications that are optimized for their own admissions processes. Going to The Common Application would involve more work for them, and would not necessarily reduce work for those who apply to those schools (since the applicants may not necessarily apply to other schools on The Common Application).

If a student really wants to attend a UC or a UT, they will find a way to endure the “pia” of the extra application.

That’s the whole point.

Make it even more manageable so that next year we have a senior accepted to 1,490 schools, instead of just 149 schools.

@Sue22: you absolutely nailed it.

In some ways, kids are spoiled by all the information and technology at their disposal. Like you, I went to college in the 80’s. We had one community pay phone in our dorm and it wasn’t used that often. Can you imagine that today?

Of course, there’s a downside to all that information and technology and I wouldn’t trade my experiences for those of my kids. But, yeah, the college app process is definitely easier now than then.

I didn’t find the college application process to be that difficult with the Common App. While different schools required different supplements and had different deadlines, it was quite simple to see them all listed out on my dashboard. I was applying to Canadian schools at the same time, and did not find it unreasonable to balance applications through the Common App and a different system at the same time (though I will say, I appreciated the centralization of the Common App - with my Canadian supplements, I had to wait for an email from each school after applying and then submit my supplements through school-specific portals, all with different deadlines).

I don’t think their proposed solution revolutionizes anything either, Different schools are looking for different things, so they probably wouldn’t want to all look at the same two essays. Students still have to research and write an additional essay for each school. The prompt “Why do you want to attend this specific college?” ad nauseam is boring and repetitive for both the students and admissions officers (after all, how many ways can you write such an essay for each college?).

I also question the utility of the 12 college cap. Around a quarter of high school students apply to seven or more schools, and I suspect most of these are in the 7-12 range rather than 13+. Many students who apply to a greater number of colleges do so because they are aiming for highly unpredictable merit aid (or admissions to schools that provide excellent need-based aid), and these policies may end up hurting them.

YUP. Or financial aid with a business or divorce, where NPCs are not very useful.

I applied to colleges in 1989 using the Common App. Not sure when it started, but it definitely existed in the 80s.

It was a physical form, and I got 5 of them to apply to 5 schools (LACs, all). I wrote my short answers and essay on the computer, printed it out, and then cut and physically taped them to the common app, which I then mailed.

I recall that I also did supplementary questions for some of the schools, just adding on the page from the school’s app to the common app so I could answer them.

I also applied to UCs, which was, at that time, also one application with checkboxes for each school. One thing that made it easier was that the (single) essay required for UCs had options similar to the CA essay, so I was able to use the one CA essay for UCs as well.

D17 applied to:

Common App- 1
UK Common App - 5 (max allowed)
Cal State/Cal Poly - 2
UC- 3

So 11 schools, 4 separate applications. UC and Cal State should merge their apps and only have you do the essays if you are applying to UCs.

Common app started in 1975, had 100 schools, mostly LACs and no Ivys yet, in 1980.
Google “The uncommon rise of the common app”

In 1989, I used it for Occidental, Pomona, Carleton, Vassar, Amherst

I also strongly agree with @Sue22 's comments above – it really is easier than ever to research colleges, see where you stack up, and then apply. The headline is pure sensationalism. I too applied in 1979 – Brown’s app required a handwritten essay and your photo!

There is some truth that many first-gen and lower SES applicants are at a disadvantage. Statistically they may not have parents pushing them or quality guidance counselors helping them. There still exist quirks and strategies and good advice that improve odds when one has knowledgeable parents and counselors.

I am most baffled by the suggestion that supplemental essays are somehow unfair. They’re going to college and will have to write a lot! Anyone turned off by that is not serious, IMO.

Moving to a standard schedule is also a misplaced suggestion. What’s wrong with 1st tiers expecting everything Jan 1 and 2nd tiers picking up the Early round rejectees with Jan 15 and Feb 1 deadlines? Helped my son.

As for the app # cap, it does sound reasonable though I’d put the max as 15. For a student with a mixture of strong and less-strong elements of their app, applying to 5 reach- 5 match- 3 safety is totally reasonable. (again speaking from my family’s experience.)

Just my opinion. Curious what others think.

Regarding limiting the number of applications…

A high school with limited resources may reasonably put a cap on the number of unique counselor and teacher recommendations any one student may get to avoid overburdening the counselors and teachers.

This is a joke, right? It’s NEVER been easier to apply to college. Just look at how long it takes so many schools to make decisions now. It’s due to the influx of applications because - wait for it - it’s so damn easy to apply. Every school we visited with our son, and now every school we visit with our daughter, they ALL say how much applications have increased year, by year, by year.

The Common App has greatly simplified the application process, but it could be made more simple. For an under-resourced kid without good support from parents and the high school, it still is a lot to manage.

Like how about letting kids directly submit their test scores, rec letters and transcripts instead of having to coordinate with multiple other parties to send the same stuff out over and over again to each different school? Maybe the Common App should let you put all that stuff in just once, and then each school can access that data upon receipt of an application? Schools could always verify that stuff after a kid is accepted as a condition of enrollment.

At the high end (which is the CC crowd), the Common App is actually too easy and is a victim of its own success. The solution at the high end isn’t Common App changes. First, the top 30-ish school all get rid of binding ED and SCEA. Second, they all go to limited EA instead. You can only apply early to 3-5 of the top 30 schools.

Without the distortion/scarcity created by ED, yields would go down. Which means admit rates would go up. Which means that the number of apps would go down eventually. The whole system would de-escalate. But that will never happen.

Once you get out of the top band of highly selective schools, there’s really not so much need to limit the number of apps. Except for crazy trophy hunters, what’s the point of doing 25 applications to schools that you know you will get into? Some extra transparency on merit aid also would help calm things down too.

Yes, the lack of transparency with merit scholarships (other than automatic-for-stats ones) means that students seeking merit scholarships (because college is not affordable to them on need-based aid or list price) are often unable to make good reach/match/safety assessments (based on the merit scholarships they need to make the colleges affordable, not just admission). This may lead them to apply to larger numbers of schools than they would need to if they could make better reach/match/safety assessments on the merit scholarships.

How do you make merit aid more transparent when its not automatic based on stats?