<p>calmom,
you know, I did not read all of BHG’s comments in the earlier 'Film’thread really carefully, but as I scanned some of them, I definitely got the picture that she was wise & even somewhat laid back, or certainly philosophical about the topic, & with some balanced humor as well. I think the whole tone of it was more like, Since This, Now What? I think it was a guidance inquiry.</p>
<p>However, with regard to your other quoted thread titles, & just in general many of the concerns raised on the whole CC board, I have to say that I don’t know whether the Chicken or the Egg comes first. Since grammar school, my younger D (who does not appear outwardly as academically ambitious as big Sis) has been anxious irrationally sometimes about ONE grade on a test pulling her down from high A’s in that one class to maybe a temporary A-. Her classmates were also mostly party types, so this couldn’t have been coming from them. I comforted/corrected her then, I do the same now in h.s. (She was in tears yesterday about not yet making an A in the most difficult freshman class in the hs.) My policy with both girls has always been I expect only their best effort within what is reasonable, not “all A’s.” So this doesn’t come from Mom, either. There is such a thing as Internal Drive; I think both my Ds have it.</p>
<p>But there is an area I totally concur with anyone who has concern about external pressures. That is in the area of e.c.'s. And I am going to place most of the blame on this squarely on the colleges. I.m.o., they have set the standard. They require an applicant to be a combination of Barry Bonds, Baryshnikov, Mother Theresa, & Einstein [emphasis on independent research]. Well, let me tell you, all those colleges must have rotten math departments. Colleges, listen up: This is not mathematically possible in a 24/hr day within the space of 17 years. But in the attempt to reach those impossible heights, this is where I see stress, anxiety, meltdown, burning the candle at both ends, etc. And I have to admit that I’m anxious, too. I am far more anxious about my younger D telling me she might want to quit an activity than she might be getting a B in a class or a C on a test.</p>
<p>We all know that plenty of 4.0’s do not get into top colleges, some not even into 2nd tier ones. But <4.0’s with great e.c.'s CAN get into many of the competitive colleges of their choice. It’s in the area of e.c.'s that I think the rubber meets the road. All the e.c.'s of my children have come from their motivation, but I sure as heck am glad my older one never happened to want to reduce hers, & I keep praying that my younger one will stay “passionate.” (ahem) This is insane, folks. These kids have no leisure.</p>
<p>Possibly, the multitude of opportunities that began to be offered to the post-post baby boomers now of age – by their baby-boomer parents, led incidentally to an accumulation of non-academic accomplishment about a decade ago (or longer?). By the time those kids reached college age, perhaps they subsequently brought a standard to the college admissions scene that later classes are now required to meet & surpass. Just speculating here. All I know is, yes, I was quite accomplished, as was much of my senior class, but it usually was not on the nat’l & internat’l level. (!)</p>
<p>THE NEW COLLEGE “GOLD STANDARD”:
Good level of accomplishments for admissions prospects = no one in your h.s. can touch you
Better level = prominent
Best level = famous
Best of all = You’ve achieved what most people couldn’t until at least age 40.</p>
<p>At what point will this stop?</p>