The democrat debate is over and both candidates are winners

Parent Cafe
1

<p>They blow away the republican candidates. I like both of them. I think one reason people dislike Hillary is because she is so intelligent.</p>

<p>Either candidate is so much better than the republican candidates.</p>

<p>I think it is going to be a democrat landslide in Nov.</p>

2

<p>She lied. She told a whopper! She said straight out that Saddam Hussein kicked U.N. weapons inspectors out of Iraq. She knows it is a lie - Saddam Hussein NEVER kicked U.N. weapons inspectors of our Iraq - BILL CLINTON DID.</p>

<p>It’s important because it goes back to the question whether she was in on the Big Lie of 1998, why she didn’t need to read the intelligence report, why she voted for war, why she supported the aggressive, hostile occupation from the Pork Zone in 2005.</p>

<p>And why she is not qualified to be President.</p>

<p>(and you can bet there isn’t a tv commentator who is going to touch the lie with a ten-foot poll).</p>

3

<p>I also think they are both winners also. </p>

<p>I think Hillary is very intelligent. Most of the time people are very afraid of intelligent women. There is a very intelligent prof in my department(she used to be the only woman in the department until recently) who is hated by some of the “old” men because she would not yes sir them. They tried really hard to deny her tenure.</p>

4

<p>Well, I dislike Hilary. But, it IS going to be a Democratic landslide in Nov. especially with McCain possibly running. It’s clear, Americans are heavily against the war. And the Democrats are the only ones saying that.</p>

5

<p>Mini, you are in your fifties.</p>

<p>They all lie.</p>

<p>Hillary is incredibly smart.</p>

6

<p>She IS incredibly smart–and manipulative. Can’t put the first part without the second part.</p>

7

<p>A timeline about UN inspections in Iraq 1997 to 2000.</p>

<p><a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_disarmament_crisis_timeline_1997-2000[/url]”>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_disarmament_crisis_timeline_1997-2000&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

8

<p>I have no problem with candidates lying. I do have problems with so-called newspeople not calling them on it. The Iraqis had the U.S. spies removed (it was confirmed they were spies January 8, 1999), but the 125 UNSCOM inspectors were “removed” as a result of Clinton’ call to Richard Butler December 16, 1998, at the beginning of the largest bombing of a sovereign nation by the United States since Viet Nam.</p>

9

<p>Wasn’t this Obama’s best debate performance?
Are there any undecideds out there who are now convinced now?</p>

10

<p>According to CNN’s poll of undecided Dem voter, Hillary won.</p>

11

<p>dstark, you beat me to it. Whether they were actually or constructively kicked out seems more semantic than important. SH was the real problem here. All the rest is BS.</p>

12

<p>October, 1997</p>

<p>"UNSCOM destroys large quantities of illegal chemical weapons and related equipment. Iraq admitted that some of this equipment had been used to produce VX gas in May, 1997. "</p>

13

<p>“According to CNN’s poll of undecided Dem voter, Hillary won.”</p>

<p>According to the Democratic group Frank Luntz was polling, Obama was the undisputed winner and changed votes from Hillary to Obama.</p>

14

<p>I completely agree with dstark’s first post. Right on.</p>

15

<p>Frank Luntz is a Fox-news rightie tool who wants nothing more than for Obama to be the Democratic candidate, because they (Republicans) think he’d be easier to beat than Hillary. Do not believe his polls.</p>

16

<p>" Do not believe his polls"</p>

<p>Are you calling his entire focus group of self-designated Democrats, most who spoke live on TV, liars?</p>

<p>The CNN poll was by electronic vote, oui? We’ve seen how accurate those can be-Think Ron Paul.</p>

17

<p>“According to the Democratic group Frank Luntz was polling, Obama was the undisputed winner and changed votes from Hillary to Obama.”</p>

<p>That makes no sense.</p>

<p>I watched the CNN stream that measured undecided voter reaction the entire night. She consistently almost always did better than Obama, usually being in the 65-75% margin. Obama was usually in the 50-60% range.</p>

18

<p>No, I am saying that pollsters manipulate results by the way questions are worded, and that Frank Luntz in particular is well known for his questionable polling techniques as well as his ties to the Republican Party.</p>

19

<p>“No, I am saying that pollsters manipulate results by the way questions are worded”</p>

<p>The question was, who won the debate? That’s being manipulative?</p>

20

<p>They both did great. Go dems!</p>