<p>A correction to post #11: (and I know these weren’t the posters’ words)</p>
<p>Women were gatherer-hunters too. Hunter-gatherers is the oft used term, but it is not as accurate as gatherer-hunters because gathering provided 80% of the food. Women hunted too, but they only hunted small game, not large. The reason for this was that children are too noisy to have along when large game was hunted. It was done in groups and there would have been no one to leave the kids with.</p>
<p>It wasn’t a question of strategy or strength – the most common was to kill large game was to edge a stray herd member to an elevation an force them to fall off.</p>
<p>Of course, other strategies were used as well.</p>
<p>Are men and women the same with different genitalia? I guess there are some social-constructivists who believe this. I certainly don’t, and I teach women’s studies. There are three areas of functioning that women and men have consistently scored differently on every measure devised: verbal ability, manual dexterity, and spacial relations. Women outscore men on the first two; men outscore women on the third. One student told me that proved women should be secretaries. I said I thought it means we should be brain surgeons and violinists.</p>
<p>My point is that facts exist but interpretations differ (not by gender, I just mean by individuals. And of course, that’s perfectly expected and legitimate.)</p>
<p>And I think women and men differ in other ways as well. For example, young men will take more risks. 150 men died building the Brooklyn Bridge. Many of them fathers. I am not sure you could get a whole bunch of women to climb that scaffolding. And I think the Brooklyn Bridge is beautiful as well as supremely useful. I am not suggesting that these differences favor women or make us superior.</p>
<p>And even if social-constructivists were right, our different genitalia would make us have different concerns, like contraception, abortion, paid family leave, places to breast feed in public, etc, etc.</p>
<p>And I don’t think women and men have equal reception in the world. Watching the college acceptance process and the summer job/internship process with a son and a daughter it is obvious to me that my son still enjoyed an advantage. Now my son felt his sister did because he mentioned the fact that he would have liked a school like Barnard: a LAC at a major university in NYC. He liked the combination. However, he chose something very opposite – rural and small even though he had similar opportunities, so I think he was just making a point. He is a graduate of Williams.</p>
<p>I really feel that the DNC made its preference for Obama over Hilary very clear. I like Obama. I think Hilary would have made a better president. Just an opinion. I thought gender politics were, sadly, alive and well.</p>
<p>As for the phrase “are not infinity plastic,” this means that emotions cannot be shaped and manipulated to suit the situation. Plastic means moldable. My H and my first H and most of the men I’ve known have believed that emotions can be just swept away or changed at will. That hasn’t been my experience.</p>
<p>Now speaking to the point that some of these are individual differences and not gender differences I would say that of course there are differences in individuals and a woman can be more compartmentalized and a man more empathetic. Of course that’s true. However, there are statistical norms.</p>
<p>In my women’s studies classes, I make the point that if Danny DeVito came in he would be the shortest person in the room (usually it’s true), and if Janet Reno came in, she would be the tallest person in the room. That does not detract from the FACT that in the human race men are 17% bigger than women as a statistical norm.</p>
<p>Shakespeare would probably always be the most verbally talented person and Maya Lin would have more spatial ability than most men.</p>
<p>Generalizations and norms stay little about individuals at the edges of bell curves.</p>
<p>However, I still believe that whether through genetics, experience, or treatment in general women and men see, feel and live the world in slightly different ways and that many laws now being written are uncomfortable for women. It is also a fact that some of these initiatives come from women. I could speculate volumes about that, but I won’t.</p>