"What I am saying is that the dress-up, nail polish, make-up glamour photo stuff is not what it’s really likewh to be a woman. "
I’m beginning to think that society is trying to force people like me, who do not “dress their gender”, to self-identify as "gender fluid solely based on makeup, clothing, and hair choices. I am perfectly happy, female, long-term straight relationship, and perhaps wear a dress every five years maybe, but probably less than that. I never wear makeup. I try to keep my hair clean, but it can be months between hair cuts, let alone ever having my “hair done” (at least since my mom passed and was making me go with her to get my hair “done”).
Are you in puberty or beyond and have a serious problem with your primary and secondary sex characteristics? Then yeah, break out ICD-9: 302.85 and start your journey to where you want to be.
But if you just want to dress up like the opposite gender (as you can argue women like me do every day without anyone batting an eyelash), just do that.
I feel that not only is the “every transgender woman is an attractive, stylish, vogue lovely woman” trope disheartening and misogynistic for many women, it is also denigrating anyone who decides to “cross-dress” (society’s words for something that should not be taboo or of any concern to the general public) or otherwise not fit their gender mold.
Newsflash, men wear skirts or dresses in some societies. And another newsflash, women wear pants. And some women even have short hair, and some men have long hair. And some fathers are more sensitive and compassionate than their wives…
I just don’t get how LGBT works out, because all the arguments for transgender seem to disqualify the LGB part…
Note that gender fluidity is NOT mentioned on GLAAD’s website, which I feel is a shame since it is more the reality than people “feeling 100% male or 100% male”, in my experience (and using society’s “gender norms”)…
http://www.glaad.org/reference/transgender
(I am teaching my kids to identify as human beings, and respect all human beings.)
(oh, and I always remember that Renee Richards main detractors said she was a very ugly woman, as that should be the criteria to change or not - now it is the reverse, how beautiful a woman can you be if you were born a man, or how manly a man can you be if you were born a woman?
http://www.gq.com/entertainment/celebrities/201505/renee-richards-interview )