The pen is mightier than the sword.

<p>Do you agree?</p>

<p>Debate.</p>

<p>Actions speak louder than words.</p>

<p>A picture is worth a thousand words.</p>

<p>Clich</p>

<p>I like that phrase. </p>

<p>But then you get those people who don’t listen and would rather run you through with a sword first and talk later. So it really depends.</p>

<p>I agree. Plus, a pen is more fun and satisfying to use than a sword.</p>

<p>With a sword(/gun/weapon of choice), you can make someone follow you. With a pen, you can make someone WANT to follow you. That’s all the difference :D</p>

<p>The fact that the “pen” (mostly those of journalists, but some radical novelists/poets as well) causes the use of the sword/AK47 is, in itself, proof that one is mightier than the other, no? After all, aren’t all wars/murders/uses of weaponry caused by some sort of ideal, whether it be for the said ideal or against it? The beginnings of fights are always rooted in idealistic differences, which are spread through the written word.</p>

<p>No, wars aren’t always for ideals. Sometimes you’re just poor, or cramped, or bored.</p>

<p>^ or thirsty/hungry</p>

<p>the pen is mightier than the sword, but the nuke is mightier than both.</p>

<p>Swords can cut pens.</p>

<p>I would say the sword is stronger. </p>

<p>The sword is often the final arbiter in an issue cause by pens.</p>

<p>Nothing is stronger than a pen/switchblade combo made of mithril.</p>

<p>The Peni.s: Mightier than the Sword</p>

<p>lol^</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>…have you ever killed a man?</p>

<p>Well…I would imagine it wouldn’t feel very pleasant.</p>

<p>I was going more for that writing caustic words is more pleasant, than physically hurting someone.</p>

<p>You mean you guys have never stabbed anyone? You really should! It is a lot more fun than it sounds. You don’t even have to kill anyone if you aren’t into that. You can just stab some non-essential part of him/her.</p>