The Phantom Professor

<p>This links to an article about an adjunct professor at SMU who recently lost her position, apparently over an anonymous web-blog she was writing. Interesting article, and be sure to read the blog, as well.</p>

<p>Disclaimer: Every now and then I post links to articles that I just find really interesting…there is no hidden extremist agenda here! :slight_smile: I have no brief for or against this prof, for or against SMU, etc. I just thought the whole thing was very interesting and worth a read!</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2005/05/11/phantom[/url]”>http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2005/05/11/phantom&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Thanks for posting. Fascinating article and blog!</p>

<p>Here’s a snippet to entice folks to check it out:
"
No one at Southern Methodist University knew — for sure — who The Phantom Professor was. The professor’s blog, like those of many untenured academics, was anonymous and the university was never named.</p>

<p>Sure, readers learned that the Phantom Professor’s college had a lot of wealthy students, many of whom dressed alike, and many of whom weren’t particularly good writers. But that doesn’t really narrow it down. And the Phantom’s university was one where many adjuncts, like the author of the blog, felt invisible and ignored — not exactly an unusual quality.</p>

<p>But at SMU, at least some students and faculty members (and the university’s legal office) did become aware of the Phantom Professor and the many similarities between incidents at the Phantom’s campus and at SMU. And in SMU’s Department of Corporate Communications and Public Affairs, people recognized themselves and their colleagues. And word got around that the author was probably Elaine Liner, a popular writing instructor and a theater critic for a local alternative newspaper…"
<a href=“http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2005/05/11/phantom[/url]”>http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2005/05/11/phantom&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Thanks for the link.</p>

<p>If the prof was canned because of the blog (and they certainly don’t seem to be offering any other reasons) SMU is way too thin skinned.</p>

<p>Hopefully if the teacher is as good as the quoted students say she is, she will land on her feet.</p>

<p>I loved reading her blog. How can I find more?</p>

<p>Here’s the link. She apparently has experienced her first “Insta-lanche”–Blogspeak for having been mentioned by Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit.com–and then being inundated with hits. Hope it doesn’t go to her head too much…if she loses her inner muse and gets overly political–as I think she did today–instead of doing what she was doing so well (trenchant commentary on her specific experience)–the charm will fade quickly. </p>

<p><a href=“http://phantomprof.blogspot.com/[/url]”>http://phantomprof.blogspot.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>She is a fabulous “read” - thanks so for sharing her site.</p>

<p>But I want more!</p>

<p>

That’s what’s driving the blogosphere! :)</p>

<p>Hey - I found a few more blogs by the PP in case you haven’t seen them…</p>

<p><a href=“The Phantom Professor”>The Phantom Professor;

<p>More:</p>

<p><a href=“The Phantom Professor”>The Phantom Professor;

<p>Okay - this site gets you into her first entries (November) and you can hit on all the archives since then so you get everything…</p>

<p><a href=“The Phantom Professor”>The Phantom Professor;

<p>I must be a huge idiot, but I don’t know what a blog is</p>

<p>amith - it’s kind of like a journal entry, but posted on the internet where anyone can read it.</p>

<p>It’s short for web-log.</p>

<p>That was a great little excursion of truthful, blatant writing.
I loved it.</p>

<p>Heh. She’s added a copyright notice. Things must be going well. :)</p>

<p>Update: Not a whole lot new in this recent article (5/28), but at the end she says she’s being offered movie deals!
<a href=“http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/front/3201823[/url]”>http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/front/3201823&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Well, allow me to offer a different opinion.</p>

<p>Am I really the only one who show some dismay about this “person” receiving accolades? </p>

<p>Yes, Mrs. Liner can write, and so can the few Harvard graduates who work for tabloids such as the National Enquirer. That does not elevate the rag to a great status among newspaper. Trash is still trash. Mrs. Liner must have done well in her English classes, but she most definitely must have been sleeping through her Ethics classes. </p>

<p>Where did she get the motion that her paltry adjunct teacher’s position gives her the RIGHT to judge her students in the way she does? She is paid to teach and grade, not to be a social commentator. Don’t we expect a bit more from our teachers? Don’t we expect our teachers not to measure us by the type of clothes we wear or the fitness of our bodies? Don’t we expect our teachers to respect the environment THEY accepted to teach at? Why in the world does a flaming liberal accept a position at SMU, unless she secretly expected that the faculty would be no different from the remaining liberal-infested 99%? </p>

<p>Yes, most everyone who ever lived in Dallas knows that SMU is the school where one “pays his fees and collect his Bees!” Most everyone knows that the school caters to the bright and not so bright. However, is that really different from a cross-section of students throughout the US? If Jay Leno makes fun of students during his famous Jaywalking episodes, that is okay. He is a comic! But where is the integrity and … courage of Mrs. Liner. Yeah, an anonymous blog goes a long way to hide her despicable image and gushing vitriol. What a lesson for her student: hate plagiarism but applaud spineless libel! A true teacher! </p>

<p>Most of what she writes is simply stomach-churning. She must REALLY hate her life to show such a disdain -if not hate- for the Prada crowd that happens to be a group of 18-22 years old. The fact that she can only afford to wear Salvation Army clothes must really bug her to death, but it is also her own doing. Not satisfied with your $200 a week job, try te corporate world, Mrs Liner. There must be a few Enron’s that value people with your integrity. A quick question: if she despises the brand labels so much, why did she purchase a fake purse at a flea-market? Felt a bit insecure and envious, didn’t she!</p>

<p>So what do we have here. A new Rachel Toor? A person who shows how much she hates the world around her to devote more love to a pig than to any human bipede? At least, Mrs. Toor had the COURAGE of her opinions. She used HER name when penning her book. </p>

<p>All I have to say is that I hope that the “Ashlees” depicted in this “worK” have fathers and mothers who will hound her for years, and slap lawsuits and injuctions onto every attempt to profit from her vile actions. Movies? Why not? There are enough people interested in seeing Michael Moore’s film! Books? Let’s see how well Mrs. Liner makes the transition from making cheap fun of students to writing something that presents any value. </p>

<p>This has nothing to do with freedom of speech. It it was, she should have gone public and defended her right to speak. I do hope that Mrs. Liner gets treated harshly; it still would not compare to the manner in which she judges her -former- students. </p>

<p>Yes, pass the Pepto!</p>

<p>I agree with you, Xiggi. I think it is shameful that an adult who is hired to teach, guide and advocate for kids derides them without the distance that time could have provided. A memoir is one thing, and though I was not particularly impressed with Rachel Toor’s opinions, she wrote her book AFTER she removed herself from her position and contact with the students. Kids tend to go to college with alot of baggage, problems, immaturity. They don’t need to be mocked by the professors there in an anonymous blog. Enough that their fellow students do so. It is a folly of youth and should not be that of the adults. I also did not think the writngs of the Phantom Professor so inciteful. Hurtful, and amusing, yes, but not helpful or useful.</p>

<p>Spoiled Ashleys have much worse problems than being identified as spoiled Ashleys. </p>

<p>Xiggi: would you have a problem with a conservative prof doing a blog skewering the ultra-liberal leanings of his colleagues and students?</p>

<p>People do not seem to dispute the accuracy of the characterizations of SMU. Don’t shoot the messenger!</p>